There are no new polls today so we stick with our predictions from this article from last night. But note that Ohio has decided not to hold their primary today, so ignore that prediction.
It was just a week ago that the Democratic Party held its
first primaries with only Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders on the ballot (and, oh yes,
Tulsi Gabbard). We noted that the
Democratic race had finally been narrowed down to two contenders -- and “let
the games begin.”
Those games, just begun, may very well end with tomorrow’s
primaries.
It is yet another big Tuesday for delegates, the third in a
row. A total of 554 pledged delegates
are at stake, with Florida (219) the largest prize, followed by Illinois (155),
Ohio (136) and Arizona (67). (And we note
that Ohio Governor Mike DeWine has just filed a lawsuit seeking a postponement
of the primary due to the coronavirus and the CDC directive to cancel events
that will have more than 50 people in attendance.)
By the AP count, Biden heads into the March 17 primaries with
894 delegates to 743 for Sanders. (There
still remain about 54 delegates that have yet to be allocated from prior
primaries.) Roughly speaking, Sanders
numerically is in similar shape as he was in 2016, when he trailed Hillary Clinton
by 211 delegates going into the March 15 primaries, and that faced by Clinton in
2008 when she was chasing Barack Obama (by roughly 100-150 delegates in this
general timeframe).
Sanders has an even steeper climb now than in 2016. Biden has thoroughly whipped him all over the
map over the last two weeks. The one
bright spot that emerged for Sanders on Super Tuesday – the west – was eliminated
last week when Biden won in Idaho, and is leading in a Washington race that has
yet to be called, thus leaving Sanders to claim victory only in the tiny North
Dakota caucus. And these races also
proved that Sanders’ core constituency, the youth vote, will not come out to
vote, at least not in the numbers Sanders needs to overcome Biden. Biden’s coalition of older, suburban and
African-American voters, who do typically
turnout for elections, turned out for Biden in these contests in droves. It is “Incremental Joe,” not “Revolutionary
Bernie, who is moving the masses to the polls.
Sanders also faces another problem – his chances tomorrow. As badly as he fared four years ago at this
time, with Clinton besting him by about 100 delegates, tomorrow looks like it
will be a bloodbath perhaps twice that size, according to the polls. “Joementum” is a force of nature at this
point, and neither the 2016 Sanders nor the 2008 Clinton ever quite faced an
outlook like this:
State
|
Poll
|
Date
|
Biden
|
Sanders
|
Margin
|
Florida
|
3/11 - 3/12
|
65
|
27
|
Biden +38
|
|
Florida
|
3/6 - 3/12
|
63
|
25
|
Biden +38
|
|
Florida
|
3/10 - 3/12
|
66
|
25
|
Biden +41
|
|
Florida
|
3/5 - 3/10
|
66
|
22
|
Biden +44
|
|
Florida
|
3/6 - 3/8
|
69
|
14
|
Biden +55
|
|
Florida
|
3/5 - 3/7
|
61
|
25
|
Biden +36
|
|
Florida
|
3/4 - 3/4
|
61
|
12
|
Biden +49
|
|
Illinois
|
3/11 - 3/12
|
57
|
36
|
Biden +21
|
|
Illinois
|
3/10 - 3/12
|
63
|
25
|
Biden +38
|
|
Ohio
|
3/11 - 3/12
|
57
|
35
|
Biden +22
|
|
Ohio
|
3/10 - 3/15
|
58
|
35
|
Biden +23
|
|
Arizona
|
3/11 - 3/13
|
51
|
31
|
Biden +20
|
|
Arizona
|
3/6 - 3/11
|
51
|
34
|
Biden +17
|
|
Arizona
|
3/3 - 3/4
|
45
|
17
|
Biden +28
|
|
Arizona
|
3/10 - 3/15
|
53
|
36
|
Biden +17
|
Given the inexorable delegate math to date, and the
gruesome polls for what lay ahead, Sanders really only one potential catalyst
that could turn the tide: last night’s
debate. To stop, and reverse, the Joe
Juggernaut would require Sanders to decimate Biden in the debate, even beyond
Elizabeth Warren’s utter evisceration of Mike Bloomberg in Nevada. And one can easily see the appeal of this
strategy – Sanders is a superb debater and Biden is a terrible one. Biden fared reasonably poorly or worse in
most debates, but with eight candidates on the stage he could “hide” for long
stretches of time. But two hours of
frontal assault by Sanders, with just the two of them, might indeed truly shine
a spotlight on Biden’s deficiencies, so goes the theory.
But two factors mitigated against this strategy. One was Sanders’ own recognition that such
damage could truly backfire, and, instead of destroying Biden, might merely
wound him – not enough to take the nomination away, but enough to damage Biden
in the general election versus Trump.
And the other was the coronavirus, and how unseemly such a tactic might
look to a nation hungry for statesmanship and unity.
Sanders played it halfway.
He was fairly diplomatic in the first half of the debate as they parried
about what the pandemic required (Biden: action now, Sanders: a reshaping of
our health care system). The gloves came
off in the second half, when Sanders went after Biden on a range of issues, recalling
past Biden votes and positions that have not aged well.
But it did not work.
Biden, seemingly relaxed with more time to talk and no audience to wow,
more than held his own and, if he did not win, played to a modest loss or
possibly even a draw. And, just in case
he needed a headline to overwhelm potentially bad coverage, Biden deftly
announced that he would select a woman to be his Vice President. Which indeed was the post-debate
headline. (Sanders equivocated on this,
when asked.)
Which brings us to tomorrow. With Sanders unlikely to have re-shaped the
race with the debate, it is hard to envision a scenario that looks promising
for him.
BTRTN MARCH 17 PREDICTIONS
Our BTRTN prediction is that Joe Biden
will sweep the March 17 primaries by significant margins in
each. He will emerge with approximately
200+ net delegates more than Sanders from these four states alone, giving him a
lead of roughly 350 delegates.
Those polls are not lying – that’s 15 polls since Super Tuesday
across the four states that all have Biden ahead by double digits, ranging from
+17 to +55 percentage points over Sanders.
March 17 Primaries
|
Vote %*
|
Delegates
|
|||
State
|
Delegates
|
Biden
|
Sanders
|
Biden
|
Sanders
|
Florida
|
219
|
74%
|
24%
|
165
|
54
|
Illinois
|
155
|
65%
|
34%
|
102
|
53
|
Ohio
|
136
|
61%
|
37%
|
85
|
51
|
Arizona
|
67
|
62%
|
37%
|
42
|
25
|
Total
|
577
|
387
|
180
|
||
* Figures do not as to 100% as some votes will go to Gabbard or
others
|
WHAT NEXT?
A 350+ Biden delegate lead is insurmountable.
Sanders may still stay in the race, for the “platform” it
provides, a la Tulsi Gabbard. His goal
in that instance would be to continue to draw Biden leftward in his policy
positions. Biden has already embraced Elizabeth
Warren’s bankruptcy bill and tuition-free college plan, and it is not
unreasonable to expect that Sanders’ pressure could bring more progressive
elements to Biden’s agenda.
But the view here is that Sanders’ hanging around is
unlikely, for three reasons – all related to the coronavirus. First, from a public health standpoint,
limiting primary voting turnout is a paramount consideration. Second, Sanders may have a platform as a
candidate, but if he cannot hold rallies, it is a vastly reduced one. And finally, it may be unseemly, as the virus
spreads, for him to attempt to carry on a futile campaign.
The responsible action would be to withdraw and begin the
process of trying to unite this fractured party. And I believe that is exactly what Sanders
will do on Wednesday morning. Sanders
could still push Biden left as a condition for offering full-throated support
for Biden’s candidacy to his followers, which is something he fell well short
of for Hillary Clinton.
If it continues, the primary schedule shifts into low gear
from here until the end of April, with less than 200 delegates in play over the
next six weeks. Puerto Rico on March 29
up next (51 delegates), followed by Alaska, Hawaii and Wyoming on April 4,
three states that collectively barely have more delegates than Puerto Rico (53
total). Wisconsin is the next reasonably
large state (84) on April 7.
That’s it until the next mega-Tuesday, which is well down
the road on April 28, when a whopping 663 delegates are up, New York leading
the bill, along with a bunch of New England and mid-Atlantic neighbors: Connecticut, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, New
Jersey and Maryland.
HOW WE DID ON MARCH 10
We at BTRTN thought that Joe Biden just might sweep the
March 10 contests, and he came close. He
has won four of them to date: Michigan,
Missouri, Mississippi and Idaho.
Sanders took North Dakota, a caucus state. And Washington has yet to be called; Biden
has a 2-point lead with 94% of the precincts reporting, so that looks promising
for him. Winning or losing close races
does not matter much for the delegate count, since with proportional
allocation, both candidates get roughly the same number of candidates.
Here is a chart that summarizes how close we came. Overall we forecast Biden would end up with
199 delegates and he has 204, while Sanders achieved 132 versus our call of
148. The “miss,” while minor, was
largely due to Sanders not achieving the 15% threshold in Mississippi, thus
securing only two delegates there at the district level and none statewide. (And we should note that there are 16
delegates yet to be assigned from these contests.)
Vote Margin
|
Delegates
|
|||
State
|
BTRTN
|
Actual
|
BTRTN
|
Actual
|
Michigan
|
Biden +15
|
Biden +17
|
Biden 71/53
|
Biden 72/52
|
Washington
|
Biden +2
|
Biden +2
|
Biden 45/43
|
Tied 37/37
|
Missouri
|
Biden +20
|
Biden +25
|
Biden 40/27
|
Biden 44/24
|
Mississippi
|
Biden +45
|
Biden +66
|
Biden 26/10
|
Biden 34/2
|
Idaho
|
Biden +2
|
Biden +6
|
Tied 10/10
|
Biden 11/9
|
North Dakota
|
Biden +2
|
Sanders +13
|
Tied 7/7
|
Sanders 8/6
|
Total
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
Biden 199/148
|
Biden 204/132
|
So far we have called 18 out of 24 contests correctly, or
19 out of 25 since Washington seems a given.
We were wrong on Iowa (by one-tenth of a point), American Samoa
(Bloomberg took that one with 175 votes – not by 175 votes, with 175
votes), North Dakota (another small caucus, Sanders racked up 7,682 votes there),
and then the Super Tuesday shockers, Maine, Massachusetts and Minnesota.
Primary voting soon ending. The big question is the impact of the corona virus on the voting. Crossing fingers - will be an interesting evening. If Sanders results are much better than predicted he might continue - however if worse - he might end his campaign.
ReplyDeleteI would not have expected the corona virus have so much impact on US voting when the CBA stopped playing and Jeremy Lin returned to the US. Then the NBA seemed to be able to continue - now they have stopped playing - and now questions with primaries!
Unfortunately I think Bernie will keep going as he did in 2016 when it was very clear that he couldn't win. He may have some notion that he will have more input at the convention on policy. I think he is too stubborn to stop even though it may mean that many of his supporters become so locked in that they will never get out and vote for Biden. He will justify staying in, as I said, by the theory that it will maximize his leverage and his egotistical conviction that, no matter when he endorses Biden, his followers will almost all follow that endorsement. I hope I am wrong.
ReplyDelete