Tuesday, March 10, 5 PM EST update: There were only two new polls today (Michigan, Biden +21 and Missouri, Biden +39) and both generally confirmed our analysis (by wider margins) so we have made no changes to the forecasts below.
The Democratic race has now been clarified and it is Joe
Biden versus Bernie Sanders. Let the
games begin.
We begin with Not-Quite-Super-Tuesday, tomorrow, with six
primaries. A total of 352 pledged
delegates are at stake, with Michigan (125) the largest prize, followed by
Washington (89), Missouri (68), Mississippi (36) and Idaho (20), North Dakota
(14).
Biden heads into the March 10 primaries with 664 delegates
to 573 for Sanders. (There still remain about
100 delegates that have yet to be allocated from Super Tuesday, largely from
California.) This is hardly an
insurmountable lead, but, based on the results to date, the rest of the primary
season appears to favor Biden. Biden
has dominated in south and southwestern states and should do well in the Mid-Atlantic
states near his Delaware home. Thus, Biden-land
includes large states such as Florida (219), Georgia (105), Pennsylvania (186),
New Jersey (126) and Maryland (96). Sanders’ strength is in the west, where no
such large state primaries remain, Arizona being the largest with 67
delegates. Biden has proven his ability
to hold his own in New England, having already won in Massachusetts and
Maine.
This chart is a simple model to illustrate Sanders’
challenge. To be extremely clear, it is
not – NOT -- a prediction, it is just math.
The chart divides up the remaining states into three buckets: states where Sanders should have the edge,
states where Biden should have the edge, and toss-ups, defined by the geographies
we discussed above. As you can see,
there are far more delegates in the Biden column than the Sanders column, but
also a sizable hunk in the toss-up. If
you do some math, in which Sanders and Biden each win their states by a 55/45
margin, and they split the delegates in the toss-ups, you can see that Biden will
hold a roughly +170 lead at the end and is quite close to the magic 1,991
required for the nomination.
Remaining Delegates
|
|||||
Sanders: West
|
Toss-Up:
Midwest, New York & Islands
|
Biden: South, Southwest, Mid-Atlantic
|
|||
Washington
|
89
|
New York
|
274
|
Florida
|
219
|
Arizona
|
67
|
Illinois
|
155
|
Pennsylvania
|
186
|
Oregon
|
61
|
Ohio
|
136
|
New Jersey
|
126
|
New Mexico
|
34
|
Michigan
|
125
|
Georgia
|
105
|
Idaho
|
20
|
Wisconsin
|
84
|
Maryland
|
96
|
Montana
|
19
|
Indiana
|
82
|
Missouri
|
68
|
South Dakota
|
16
|
Puerto Rico
|
51
|
Connecticut
|
60
|
Alaska
|
15
|
W. Virginia
|
28
|
Louisiana
|
54
|
North Dakota
|
14
|
Hawaii
|
24
|
Kentucky
|
54
|
Wyoming
|
14
|
Kansas
|
39
|
||
Virgin Islands
|
7
|
Mississippi
|
36
|
||
Guam
|
7
|
Nebraska
|
29
|
||
N. Marianas
|
6
|
Rhode Island
|
26
|
||
Delaware
|
21
|
||||
DC
|
20
|
||||
Total
|
335
|
Total
|
993
|
Total
|
1139
|
Sanders 55%
|
184
|
Sanders 50%
|
497
|
Sanders 45%
|
513
|
Biden 45%
|
151
|
Biden 50%
|
497
|
Biden 55%
|
626
|
Current
|
New
|
Total
|
|||
Sanders
|
573
|
1193
|
1766
|
||
Biden
|
664
|
1274
|
1938
|
The takeaway from this numeric exercise is that Sanders has
to do better than these assumptions, somewhere, to close his gap with
Biden. The west is his stronghold, but
there are not enough delegates left there to make much of a difference even if he
wins there by healthy margins. And it
will be very hard for Sanders to overcome Biden’s strength in his prime geographies, which feature
large African-American communities, as Sanders learned in South Carolina. Most likely Sanders has to win solidly in
those big Midwestern states to make up ground, and Michigan would be a good
place for him to start.
Now, there are two things we need to make absolutely clear
at this point:
First, this is simply a base-setting exercise, not a
forecast. Much can happen in the coming weeks and months, and as we said in our last post, it would be foolish to believe there
will be no “zag” after we have just been through a stunning “zig” over the last
ten days.
But second, in the real-world view of the latest polls, the
chart above simply does not reflect how rapidly the world is changing in Biden’s
favor. A rash of brand new polls were
just released that show the following:
State/National
|
Pollster
|
Field Dates
|
Biden
|
Sanders
|
Spread
|
Michigan
|
Monmouth
|
3/5 - 3/8
|
51%
|
36%
|
Biden +15
|
Michigan
|
Yahoo News/YouGov
|
3/6 - 3/8
|
54%
|
42%
|
Biden +12
|
Michigan
|
3/8 - 3/8
|
57%
|
27%
|
Biden +30
|
|
Michigan
|
3/8 - 3/8
|
65%
|
24%
|
Biden +39
|
|
Michigan
|
3/4 - 3/6
|
54%
|
33%
|
Biden +21
|
|
Missouri
|
3/4 - 3/7
|
62%
|
32%
|
Biden +30
|
|
Mississippi
|
3/4 - 3/7
|
77%
|
22%
|
Biden +55
|
|
Arizona
|
3/3 - 3/4
|
45%
|
17%
|
Biden +28
|
|
Wisconsin
|
Yahoo News/YouGov
|
3/6 - 3/8
|
49%
|
38%
|
Biden +11
|
Pennsylvania
|
Yahoo News/YouGov
|
3/6 - 3/8
|
59%
|
31%
|
Biden +28
|
National
|
3/4 - 3/7
|
52%
|
36%
|
Biden +16
|
|
National
|
Quinnipiac
|
3/5 - 3/8
|
54%
|
35%
|
Biden +19
|
Essentially, Biden is well ahead in polls in the Midwest, Mid-Atlantic,
South, West and nationally, each poll showing a double-digit lead. The “Jomentum” is continuing, and there is nothing
to turn the tide between now and tomorrow.
And that means the “illustrative delegate chart” is a
woeful representation of the true state of the race. Biden is in much better shape than that chart
represents.
BTRTN PREDICTIONS
Our BTRTN prediction is that Joe Biden
will win the most delegates in the March 10 primaries. Biden will post easy wins in Michigan,
Missouri and Mississippi; the western states will be far closer, but Biden will
squeak out wins in each of Washington, Idaho and North Dakota. But given proportional allocation of the
delegates, whether Biden or Sanders wins the western states is immaterial as
long as the race is close.
Based on the Super Tuesday results, one might have expected
Biden to do very well in the southern states, Missouri and Mississippi, while
Sanders would take the western states, Washington, Idaho and North Dakota. Michigan would be the close one, with the
most delegates at stake and the most insight for the future Midwest battles.
But the polls, as noted above, have been pretty unambiguous
with respect to Michigan – four recent polls all show Biden trouncing Sanders by margins ranging
from +15 to +39 points. That is an awful
sign for Sanders.
Sanders and his supporters, however, can (and do) point to
this exact same race four years ago.
Hillary Clinton dominated the Michigan polls – by anywhere from +13 to
+37 points – and yet lost to Sanders by -2 points in the primary. This is worth noting, but, perhaps
stubbornly, we are sticking with the polls on this one. One interesting note – in 2016, even though
Sanders won Michigan, he ended up losing in the delegate math to Clinton that
day, as she won Mississippi, the only other primary that same day, by an 87/13
margin, enough to easily overcome the close Michigan loss.
(We now have checked into why the polls in Michigan were so wrong in 2016. One persuasive theory put forward back then was that the polling turnout projections were derived from the 2008 Michigan Democratic primary. But that primary was marred by DNC Chair Howard Dean's punishment of Michigan for moving up the timing of its primary without permission. As a result, Barack Obama did not even enter the primary, and vote turnout was low -- particularly among younger voters. Hillary Clinton won easily in 2008. And so in 2016, the pollsters did not account for this artificial dampening of the youth vote -- Sanders' core -- and they were thus underweighted dramatically in the polls. Of course, in the actual primary they came out to vote for Sanders in higher number, enough for Sanders to win. This error would presumably not be repeated in 2020, as pollsters would base their weightings on 2016 results -- thus the current polls are likely more accurate than in 2016.)
(We now have checked into why the polls in Michigan were so wrong in 2016. One persuasive theory put forward back then was that the polling turnout projections were derived from the 2008 Michigan Democratic primary. But that primary was marred by DNC Chair Howard Dean's punishment of Michigan for moving up the timing of its primary without permission. As a result, Barack Obama did not even enter the primary, and vote turnout was low -- particularly among younger voters. Hillary Clinton won easily in 2008. And so in 2016, the pollsters did not account for this artificial dampening of the youth vote -- Sanders' core -- and they were thus underweighted dramatically in the polls. Of course, in the actual primary they came out to vote for Sanders in higher number, enough for Sanders to win. This error would presumably not be repeated in 2020, as pollsters would base their weightings on 2016 results -- thus the current polls are likely more accurate than in 2016.)
The Missouri and Mississippi polls confirm a Biden
rout. There have been three polls in
Missouri, two showing large leads for Biden and one a much closer race with
Biden holding a single-digit lead. The
one recent Mississippi poll shows Biden ahead by the same order of magnitude as
his lopsided win last week in neighboring Alabama.
But the Washington polls are not confirming Sanders’
western strength. Two polls there show a
close race, with Biden ahead in each, by +3 and +1. Those polls were from immediately after Super
Tuesday (each included Warren), and thus might not account for the Biden
momentum since then (as evidenced by the polls in other states). On the other hand, Warren’s departure could
help Sanders, if only modestly. There
have been no polls whatsoever in North Dakota and Idaho.
It seems clear Biden will win Michigan, Missouri and
Mississippi. The fate of the western
states is far less clear. At this
juncture, we think the momentum is in Biden’s favor, and therefore are calling
a sweep. But, as you can see, in very
close races it hardly matters who wins or loses, since the delegates are
allocated proportionately. Close wins do
not close large gaps, and thus Biden’s large wins in Michigan, Missouri and
Mississippi will carry the day.
March 10 Primaries
|
Vote %*
|
Delegates
|
|||
State
|
Delegates
|
Biden
|
Sanders
|
Biden
|
Sanders
|
Michigan
|
125
|
57%
|
42%
|
71
|
53
|
Washington
|
89
|
50%
|
48%
|
45
|
43
|
Missouri
|
68
|
59%
|
39%
|
40
|
27
|
Mississippi
|
36
|
72%
|
27%
|
26
|
10
|
Idaho
|
20
|
50%
|
48%
|
10
|
10
|
North Dakota
|
14
|
50%
|
48%
|
7
|
7
|
Total
|
352
|
199
|
148
|
||
* Figures do not as to 100% as some votes will go to Gabbard or
others
|
WHAT NEXT?
A week from tomorrow, March 17, will bring another set of
primaries of mega-importance: Florida
(219), Illinois (155), Ohio (136) and Arizona (67).
Florida appears to be in Biden’s pocket; the one poll there
has him ahead of Sanders by a 61/12 margin, and this was fielded on Super Tuesday
and the day after, so it did not reflect the full impact of those results. There is no recent public polling in each of
the other states.
The main events that could influence a potential Biden
sweep are, of course, the results tomorrow going more Sanders’ way than
expected, and the March 15 debate, the first head-to-head match-up between
Biden and Sanders. Sanders is obviously
the better debater, and if he can rout Biden at the podium, that could turn
around his campaign.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment