The Democratic field keeps growing, up to 18 strong, and
still without Joe Biden. And the GOP
field is almost certainly set, with the emergence of the Barr summary of the
Mueller report, and its announced larger truths that no one disputes: that Mueller found no evidence of criminal
conspiracy, nor could he bring himself to declare there was obstruction of justice
(though he also fell short of exoneration).
There will be no impeachment hearings during the balance of Donald Trump’s
first term, and no challenger (other than Bill Weld) will emerge to “primary”
Trump from among those who might have been waiting for a more damning verdict.
But the most consequential developments of the past month for
the 2020 presidential race were not these developments, but rather those involving Joe Biden and Pete
Buttigieg, as we shall discuss further on.
THE FIELD
In the last month, there were three more entrants to the Democratic
field. You may have missed the late
March announcement of the “other” mayor now in the race, Wayne Messam,
who presides over Miramar, Florida, with a population of 140,328, larger than Buttigieg’s
South Bend (102,245) and dwarfing Wasilla, Alaska (which was about 8,000 when Sarah
Palin was on the GOP ticket in 2008).
But you’ve probably heard about Representatives Tim Ryan
of Ohio and Eric Swalwell of California, who both
entered in April.
Remarkably enough, the field may not yet be complete, even
apart from Biden. Stacey Abrams,
who narrowly lost the 2018 Georgia gubernatorial race, Montana Governor Steve Bullock, former Virginia governor Terry McAuliffe,
Massachusetts Representative Seth Moulton and
former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz (who
is, of course, considering an independent run) remain potential entrants. Grumbling Democrats may not consider this a
swell field, on the whole, but it is certainly a swelling one.
Thus the entire Democratic field, as of now (that is, the
announced candidates plus Biden) looks as follows, ranked by the average of the
national polls over the last month (more on the polls below):
Potential Candidates
|
Age
|
Announcement Date
|
Credentials
|
|
Joe Biden
|
76
|
TBD
|
Former VP, Former Senator, Delaware
|
|
Bernie Sanders
|
77
|
2/19/2019
|
Senator, Vermont
|
|
Kamala Harris
|
54
|
1/18/2019
|
Senator, California
|
|
Beto O'Rourke
|
46
|
3/14/2019
|
Former Representative, Texas
|
|
Elizabeth Warren
|
69
|
12/31/2018
|
Senator, Massachusetts
|
|
Cory Booker
|
49
|
2/1/2019
|
Senator, New Jersey
|
|
Pete Buttigeig
|
36
|
1/22/2019
|
Mayor, South Bend, Indiana
|
|
Amy Klobuchar
|
58
|
2/10/2019
|
Senator, Minnesota
|
|
Jay Inslee
|
67
|
3/1/2019
|
Governor, Washington
|
|
Kirsten Gillibrand
|
51
|
1/15/2019
|
Senator, New York
|
|
John Hickenlooper
|
66
|
3/4/2019
|
Former Governor, Colorado
|
|
Julian Castro
|
44
|
1/10/2019
|
Former Secretary, HUD
|
|
Andrew Yang
|
43
|
11/6/2017
|
Entrepreneur
|
|
John Delaney
|
55
|
7/28/2017
|
Representative, Maryland
|
|
Tulsi Gabbard
|
37
|
1/11/2019
|
Representative, Hawaii
|
|
Marianne Williamson
|
66
|
1/28/2019
|
Self-help author
|
|
Eric Swalwell
|
38
|
4/8/2019
|
Representative, California
|
|
Tim Ryan
|
45
|
4/4/2019
|
Representative, Ohio
|
|
Wayne Messam
|
44
|
3/28/2019
|
Mayor, Miramar, Florida
|
THE MONTH
The month was dominated by a gut-check for Biden and the
rise of Buttigieg. Biden became
embroiled in controversy when a Nevada assemblywomen, Lucy Flores, accused him
of inappropriate physical contact with her when he was campaigning in
2014. This charge was quickly followed
by other women coming forward, and video emerging that quickly confirmed
Biden’s traditional use of an old school, touchy-feely brand of retail
politics. Biden was slow to respond, did
not get it “right” off the bat, and was clearly reeling from the charges.
None of these charges were “#MeToo”-esque in nature; none
of the women who came forward were accusing him of inappropriate sexual
behavior. And while there were some who
called for Biden to not enter the race, plenty of others were willing to cut
him some slack, and not anxious for a repeat of Al Franken’s swift
expulsion. There is little question that
Biden was hurt by the issue, since, at the very least, it hit him in his
biggest area of vulnerability, that he is old and out of touch with today’s
values.
Pete Buttigieg, quite simply, has broken through. And while he has a fascinating resume, as
impressive as it is, it is not the resume that is causing the fuss. It is the man himself, how he speaks, his
common-sense, straightforward take on the issues, his personal appeal, that is
driving the “Mayor Pete” wave.
As is well chronicled by now, Buttigieg is young, the
youngest candidate in the field, at age 37, barely eligible to run for the
office. As Mayor of South Bend, he has
among the slimmest portfolios among the 18 candidates. But he has packed a great deal into that short
life, as a Rhodes Scholar and former U.S. Navy intelligence officer who served
in Iraq (as well as an undergraduate diploma from Harvard and a stint at
McKinsey). Add into the mix that he is
openly gay, and you have an utterly unique candidate who may be as right (or
ahead of) the times as Biden appears to be a relic of the past.
Buttigieg made his formal announcement this past Sunday,
and the reaction has been astonishing.
The talk is of JFK and Obama, two previous winners who ran,
respectively, on “the torch has passed to a new generation” and “hope and
change” messaging. Both were young,
fresh and credentialed, and astonishingly different from their opponents in
both the primaries and in the general election.
But all of this visceral reaction has translated into an
impressive jump in the polls, more so in Iowa, where it seems almost everyone
is paying very close attention. Quite
simply, none of the other candidates have generated anything approaching
Buttigieg’s appeal. He has surpassed
Beto as the shiniest new object of the race.
The only thing hotter than Pete Buttigieg on this planet is
James Holzhauer. And if you have never
heard of him, you simply have not been paying attention.
There have been few GOP polls, but the smattering out there indicate that Trump would crush a GOP challenger, with the margins between him and, say, Romney, at 50+ points.
THE NUMBERS
The Democratic race remains in three tiers now, both
nationally and in Iowa. We have ranked
the candidates by their Iowa poll numbers, which we consider the most important
right now. There has been limited New
Hampshire polling, but the most recent is quite similar to that of Iowa.
Biden and Bernie Sanders remain firmly alone in Tier One,
with Biden materially ahead. (You may
have seen an omnious Emerson poll earlier this week, showing him trailing
Sanders 29/24 nationally, but another poll just yesterday by Morning Consult
had Biden up 31/23 over Bernie.)
Buttigieg has jumped into Tier 2, leaping from 0% to 11% in
Iowa, and from 0% to 3% nationally. No
other candidates showed any similar movement up or down. Amy Klobuchar fell from Tier 2 to Tier 3, her
candidacy sinking under the weight of negative press on how she treats her
Senate staff, and her moderate message that may be well off the party’s lefty tendencies. Kristen Gillibrand has yet to make a mark,
and she too finds herself struggling with the governors, the representatives
and the offbeats that are filling out the field right now.
"Tiers"
|
Candidates*
|
Iowa Polls
|
Average of Naional Polls
|
Tiers
|
|||||
Emerson Jan 3 - Feb 2
|
DM Reg Mar 3-6
|
Mar 16 - Apr 15
|
Jan 16 - Feb 15
|
Feb 16 - Mar 15
|
Mar 16 - Apr 15
|
||||
Tier 1
|
Biden
|
29
|
27
|
26
|
29
|
29
|
31
|
Tier 1
|
|
Sanders
|
15
|
25
|
20
|
17
|
23
|
23
|
|||
Tier 2
|
Buttigeig
|
0
|
0
|
11
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
Tier 2
|
|
Harris
|
18
|
7
|
10
|
11
|
11
|
9
|
|||
Warren
|
11
|
9
|
9
|
7
|
7
|
6
|
|||
Booker
|
4
|
3
|
6
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
|||
O'Rourke
|
6
|
5
|
5
|
7
|
6
|
8
|
|||
Tier 3
|
Klobuchar
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
Tier 3
|
|
Castro
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||
Inslee
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|||
Gillibrand
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||
Hickenlooper
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||
Gabbard
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||
Delaney
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|||
Yang
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|||
Williamson
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||
Other/NA
|
11
|
19
|
9
|
18
|
11
|
7
|
|||
* Chart includes all
announced candidates except the just-announced Messam, Swalwell and Ryan;
|
|||||||||
includes only Biden
among the unannounced
|
Also worth commenting on this month are the fundraising
figures announced by the candidates for the first quarter, a perhaps even more
important scorecard than the polls. It
is fairly easy to tell the winners from the losers.
First Quarter Fundraising
|
$ Millions
|
Sanders
|
18.2
|
Harris
|
12.0
|
O'Rourke
|
9.4
|
Buttigeig
|
7.0
|
Warren
|
6.0
|
Klobuchar
|
5.2
|
Booker
|
5.1
|
Gillibrand
|
3.0
|
Inslee
|
2.3
|
Hickenlooper
|
2.2
|
Gabbard
|
2.0
|
Yang
|
1.8
|
Williamson
|
1.5
|
Castro
|
1.1
|
Delaney
|
0.4
|
Messam
|
0.1
|
Swalwell and Ryan
announced after
|
|
April 1; Biden has
yet to announce
|
WHO CAN BEAT TRUMP?
There have been several polls that pose the central
question for Democrats in the 2020 primary process: are you going to vote for the candidate that
best matches your policy views, or the one that you think is most likely to
beat Donald Trump?
One such poll, by USA Today/Suffolk University, shows
Democrats more inclined to back the one who can beat Trump over their
ideological twin by a 55-35 margin.
And so Democrats will be paying attention to head-to-head
polling, and at this early stage of the game, that is a plus for Joe
Biden. There have not been a ton of
these polls, nor do they cover each of the Democratic candidates, but we have
combined the results of two recent ones (Emerson and PPP) that cover a
half-dozen candidates. Biden easily
outpaces Trump in them, while Bernie is even.
This outcome would seem to reinforce a fear within the
Democratic Party that veering too far to the left – toward Bernie or, say,
Elizabeth Warren – for the nominee would give Trump a better chance to
win.
Dem
|
vs. Trump
|
Biden
|
+10
|
Harris
|
+4
|
O'Rourke
|
+4
|
Warren
|
+1
|
Buttigieg
|
+1
|
Sanders
|
0
|
If you would like
to be on the Born To Run The Numbers email list notifying you of each new post,
please write us at borntorunthenumbers@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment