Perhaps Kristin Mink was not the actual catalyst for Scott Pruitt's "resignation." But Steve hopes that she -- and the growing ranks of rogue angry diners confronting Trump officials-- signal a shift from passive disagreement to action.
Sure, there’s been a surfeit of knuckleballs in Crazytown,
D.C., these past few weeks, as the United States government has found it harder
than anticipated to extricate itself from the baby-snatching business, a Trump Cabinet appointee was so corrupt that he was actually too sleazy even for Donald Trump, and the
White House made a grab for power in proposing international trade
legislation that bore the acronym F.A.R.T.
Let’s hope Melania’s jacket designers are already at work.
You can say lots of things about Donald Trump, but make no
mistake about one thing: this is the luckiest man to ever sit in the Oval
Office. He inherits an economy that is so strong that even his best efforts to provoke
a trade war have not yet bled its momentum. Kim Jong-Un decides that he wants
to bring his country out of the Stone Age, so he plays on Trump’s naïveté and
ego to give Trump something that appears to the ill-informed to be an
accomplishment. And just as his administration is being vilified across the
political spectrum for ripping babies from their mothers' breasts, Anthony
Kennedy decides to retire and create an even bigger news story, knocking our humiliating
national shame on the Texas border to the C block on cable news.
And yet -- while debate raged on very real issues that will
shape our nation’s destiny for generations -- much of the nation’s video
bandwidth was allocated to looping iPhone memes of angry diners who have
discovered senior Trump officials in their midst and who have seized the
opportunity to go First Amendment postal on them.
Soon after, a young mother named Kristin Mink found herself
in the same restaurant as now deposed Environmental Protection Agency chief and
Swamp Fox Scott Pruitt. Child in arms, Mink took the opportunity to march over and suggest that he
resign for both his utter lack of respect for the environment and his daily
parade of self-enriching abuses of power and shameless ethical bankruptcy.
Pruitt must have been wondering why his legendary $3mm security force was on a
smoke break as he wordlessly absorbed the winnowing assault from a concerned
mom.
Then, California Congresswomen Maxine Waters endorsed the
actions of these rogue progressive diners, saying at a rally that “If you see
anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline
station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them and you
tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,” she added.
Ah, the Fort Sumter of the Civility Wars, with opening
salvos in quaint little restaurants all around our capital.
Of course the President of the United States weighed in,
having the gall to say, and we quote, “I hope the other side realizes that they
better just take it easy… Because some of the language used, some of the words
use, even some of the radical ideas, I think they’re very bad for the country.”
My God, what words did those filthy progressives use??? Don’t tell me they said
“son-of-a-bitch,” “pussy,” or “shithole,”
did they?
Let’s dispose of all of this stupidity quickly. If Sarah
Huckabee Sanders does not want to be asked to leave a restaurant, she could do
one of two things. She could pre-screen the restaurant owner to make sure that
he or she is as stupid, bigoted, and deceitful as she is. Or she could inaugurate
a spanking new policy in which she realizes that her job is to tell the
American people the truth about the White House. Simple as that, Sarah. Enjoy
the steak tartare in peace.
Kirstjen and Stephen, bear in mind that the money that is
keeping you in guacamole is coming from all those tax-paying patrons at your
neighboring tables. Many are sickened by your callous indifference to innocent
children and enraged that their tax dollars are being used by you to separate
infants from their mothers. Want to enjoy your burritos? Stop operating on the
same level as war criminals.
Scott Pruitt, what can we say? When you brazenly line your
pockets with the money of taxpayers, you should not be surprised that they
seize the opportunity to tell you what a contemptible sleaze bag you are. Good riddance, you shameless jerk. Time to wave
bye-bye and ooze back into the swamp from whence you slithered.
It is absolutely insane for these Republican leaders to
lie, steal, cheat, and betray the values of the ordinary Americans who pay
their salaries, and then expect that they should be treated with homage,
courtesy, and, yes, civility in the public spaces.
But that’s not what really bugs me.
What truly concerns me is the Democrats and Progressives
who are not supporting the actions of the rogue dining patrons who confront the
enemy. Yes, there are Democrats and Progressives who worry that they should not
engage in a “civility war.”
Time to get real, friends.
We are about to enter into one of the most consequential
partisan mine fields in the history of our nation.
A President whose very election is of questionable
legitimacy is about to select a Supreme Court Justice who will swing the
balance of the court to extreme conservatism for potentially decades to come.
That President is indeed choosing the Supreme Court Justice who may decide
whether the President needs to comply with a subpoena from the investigators
into his own criminality. All this, after the Republican Party shamelessly
abused the intent of the Founding Fathers by denying Barack Obama and the
American people their constitutional right to appoint a Supreme Court Justice. Meanwhile,
that special prosecutor’s investigation into potential impeachable offenses by
the President is being slandered and vilified by Republican partisans. All as
we head into the most consequential mid-term elections in American history.
This is no time to be worried about civility.
Democrats who think they should be “above the fray” had
better get down into the fray real fast.
Want a good example of Democrats not knowing what “entering
the fray” is all about? Watch them right now as they run around attempting to
invoke “the McConnell Rule.”
Democrats are crowing that since Mitch McConnell had
brazenly abused his power as the Senate Majority leader to thwart Barack Obama's
right to fill a Supreme Court vacancy by claiming that no such appointment
should be considered in the period leading up to the election, it is only fair
that Trump's new nomination should not be considered until after the mid-terms.
Why, if Mitch McConnell doesn’t see the fairness in that, then he must be the
biggest hypocrite in the world!
Now, hypocrite is actually the most flattering of 25
characterizations of Mitch McConnell I can toss out before breakfast. Mitch
McConnell was the guy who famously said that his primary objective as Senate
Majority Leader was to make Barack Obama a one-term President. Future
historians may well point to that quote as marking the day American democracy
ceased to be functional, as McConnell was clearly, overtly, and unambiguously
saying that party took priority over nation, that crippling the presidency was
more important than serving the people, and that undermining the spirit of
democracy was his guiding philosophy and overt intent.
Mitch McConnell is patient zero in the radical polarization
of our society that now threatens our very democracy. McConnell signed the
death warrant on the collegial
“civilized” horse trading that once made the U.S. Senate a working governing
entity. A strong argument can be made
that Mitch McConnell is worse than Donald Trump. The current President is
genuinely ignorant of the institutions, processes, and unwritten rules that
have long made our government work. McConnell, on the other hand, knows those
institutions intimately, and is brutally tearing them apart for personal and
party gain. In rating individuals who have been most effective in damaging our
democracy, McConnell is running only a few lengths behind Vladimir Putin.
And now we see the Democrats invoke “The McConnell Rule?”
Note to Democrats: There is no goddam
“McConnell Rule.” It was complete bullshit in the first place, a gossamer
veil that could not possibly cover the cold, gutless, ruthless power play
McConnell used to deny Barack Obama and the American people the Supreme Court appointment
they had every right to make.
For Democrats to smugly insist that we now follow “The
McConnell Rule” is to concede that McConnell had that right to make such a rule. He did not. No one does. There
is absolutely nothing in the Constitution or our law that codifies a mandatory
freeze on judicial appointments in the months prior to an election. There is no
“McConnell Rule,” and for good reason. Just to offer the most basic critique,
there are state and local elections in America every single year. There are federal elections every two years. The
supposed “McConnell Rule” does not even spell out how far in advance of an
election that court appointments are forbidden.
You could use this rule to effectively argue that no Supreme Court
appointment should ever be made.
But worst of all: if they think that invoking the “The
McConnell Rule” is going to stop the Republicans from jamming their nominee
through the Senate before the mid-terms, they are remarkably naïve. It’s silly.
It’s so... civil.
This is the most relevant contrast to make as we head into this
unprecedented partisan maelstrom: Republicans lie and make up bullshit to justify their
abuses of power and their efforts to force a minority opinion on a majority of
Americans. Democrats generally play nice.They want to be civil.
Wake up, Democrats. The Republicans own the executive
branch, the House, the Senate, and now they are going to own the judiciary.
They have all they need to ram home this nomination.
And what do you have?
Well, how’s this? You
have the majority of American people. Yes, the majority. Hillary Clinton
won the popular vote.
If you want to fight Trump’s nomination, you are going to
have to do it in the Red Hens all across the United States.
You are going to have to figure out how to turn every meek
and retiring “civilized” progressive into Kristin Mink – the kind of real-life
action hero who walks up to Scott Pruitt in a restaurant and tells him to his face that he does not deserve to be in his job.
You know the kind of passive people I am talking about… the
well-behaved, well-mannered, well-groomed nice
people who have made rules that we
just don’t talk about politics at cocktail parties.
These people need to understand that the United States is
one big Red Hen where enough angry voices in unison get heard. They have to
leave the pleasant cul-du-sac, postpone the tennis game, and get their
neighbors into the S.U.V. and drive down to that big Red Hen called Washington,
D.C.
We need more overt citizen outrage at the atrocities this
administration is committing in our names.
Don’t get me wrong. I don't mean to be saying anything rude or uncivil like “if you’re not with us,
you’re against us.”
It’s actually worse than that.
If you’re not with us, you’re apathetic. In your inaction, you appear content with your
slice of the pie. You like things just the way they are. Down at the Red Hen, you are indistinguishable from a Republican.
And you may be just a little too civil to get the job done that
desperately needs to be done.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment