We are
dispensing with the weekly “SaturData Review” feature to focus more on the fast approaching mid-term elections, but we
will still do the “Month in Review” and occasional mid-month updates, which
cover the same ground: the latest political numbers and the events that are
shaping them.
Donald Trump’s approval numbers have risen in May, not
dramatically, but still perceptibly. He
has spent his entire presidency in a notably narrow rating range, a 9-point
band from 39% to 48% (using our aggregation method, which you can find down
below, and monthly data). He is now in
the higher end of that range at 45%.
TRUMP MONTHLY APPROVAL RATING
|
|||||||||||||||||
2017
|
2018
|
||||||||||||||||
J
|
F
|
M
|
A
|
M
|
J
|
J
|
A
|
S
|
O
|
N
|
D
|
J
|
F
|
M
|
A
|
M
|
|
Approve
|
48
|
47
|
44
|
44
|
42
|
41
|
40
|
39
|
40
|
40
|
39
|
39
|
42
|
43
|
42
|
42
|
45
|
Disapprove
|
46
|
50
|
51
|
52
|
53
|
55
|
56
|
57
|
56
|
56
|
56
|
56
|
55
|
54
|
54
|
54
|
52
|
Net
|
2
|
-3
|
-7
|
-8
|
-11
|
-14
|
-16
|
-19
|
-15
|
-17
|
-17
|
-17
|
-13
|
-11
|
-13
|
-12
|
-6
|
Each modern president has experienced much wider swings
than Trump in his first 500 days. In the
chart below (and using Gallup data, which is slightly lower for Trump but
provides comparability across presidents), you can see that every president
since Carter experienced a swing from low-to-high of 20 (Obama) to 39 points
(Bush 43), with an average of 28 points.
Trump’s swing, using this data, is only ten points. This reflects at least three factors: 1) the growing polarization of our politics, 2) the lack of truly meaningful game-changers
in Trump’s time (as opposed to the two Bushes, who had the Gulf War and 9/11 to
contend with, and 3) Trump himself, who
inspires such intense loyalty and
loathing that “natural” floors and ceilings may be in place.
GALLUP APPROVAL RATING AT KEY FIRST TERM MILESTONES
|
|||||||
First-term President
|
Inaug. Day
|
Day 478
|
500 Day Range (Low-High)
|
Just Before Mid-Terms
|
Mid-Term House Change
|
Before 2nd Term Election Day
|
Re-election Results
|
Trump
|
45%
|
43%
|
35-45%
|
tbd
|
tbd
|
tbd
|
tbd
|
Obama
|
68%
|
49%
|
47-67%
|
45%
|
-63
|
50%
|
Won 51/47
|
Bush
43
|
57%
|
76%
|
51-90%
|
63%
|
+8
|
48%
|
Won 51/48
|
Clinton
|
58%
|
51%
|
37-59%
|
46%
|
-54
|
54%
|
Won 49/41/8
|
Bush
41
|
51%
|
65%
|
51-80%
|
58%
|
-8
|
34%
|
Lost 37/43/18
|
Reagan
|
51%
|
45%
|
43-68%
|
43%
|
-26
|
58%
|
Won 59/41
|
Carter
|
66%
|
41%
|
40-75%
|
49%
|
-15
|
37%
|
Lost 41/51/7
|
This chart also demonstrates the trivial nature of Trump’s
recent rise. While the rise is welcome news
for his Administration, for sure, his lowest lows and highest highs are both the lowest of any recent president
over their first 500 days or so. His
current numbers – in the low 40’s – are in a range that signal very bad news in
the mid-terms, if he fails to push further north. And the same for his reelection hopes. The “high” mark of 45% represents trouble for
him and is perhaps the most important number.
Unlike each of his most recent predecessors, Trump has at no point had
even half of the country on his side
at any time. His predecessor all had a
strong majority behind him at some point, ranging from 59% to 90%. And polls show that a huge proportion of
those who disapprove of Trump do so “strongly” – which means that they are
unlikely to change their minds.
Trump’s recent “surge” of +3-4 points almost surely can be
attributed to the better news emanating from North Korea (Kim Jong-un’s recent threat
to cancel the June 12 summit aside). Whether
Trump deserves acclaim for this is a
different story. North Korea was never a
prominent part of candidate Trump’s “platform” (he made no campaign promises
relating to North Korea that I can find in perusing compiled lists of dozens of
such promises). Unlike his trade, immigration,
regulatory and tax policies, he was not the instigator of change. The recent thaw owes much more to North
Korea, under Kim Jong-un, finally achieving nuclear status (on Trump’s watch),
and South Korea President Moon’s peaceful overtures to his northern neighbor,
than to Trump’s threatening bluster or ramped-up sanctions. The underlying dynamics would likely have
resulted in Kim Jong-un’s new tack no matter who was in the White House.
But the more hopeful environment did happen during Trump’s
administration, and he did change the tenor of the dialogue after decades of
impasse and false hopes (which may happen here too). Whether his actions were pivotal or not is a
moot point. Trump has achieved a modest
bump in the short term, and he has a great deal riding on sustaining that
promise and translating it into true denuclearization in North Korea. If he disappoints, gravity will begin to act
on his approval rating once again.
******************************************************
Here is the complete SaturData chart with accompanying
methodology explanations:
SaturData Review
|
Jan 2017 Post-Inaug.
|
Wk ending May 12
|
Wk ending May 19
|
Change vs. Last Wk
|
Change vs. Jan 2017
|
Trump Approval
|
48%
|
45%
|
45%
|
0 pp
|
- 3 pp
|
Trump Disapproval
|
44%
|
52%
|
53%
|
-1 pp
|
- 9 pp
|
Trump Net Approval
|
+4 pp
|
- 7 pp
|
- 8 pp
|
-1 pp
|
-12 pp
|
Generic Ballot
|
D + 6
|
D + 5
|
D + 3
|
- 2 pp
|
- 3 pp
|
Trumpometer
|
0%
|
+ 9%
|
+ 9%
|
0 pp
|
+ 9 pp
|
Unemployment
Rate
|
4.7
|
3.9
|
3.9
|
0%
|
17%
|
Consumer
Confidence
|
114
|
129
|
129
|
0%
|
13%
|
Price
of Gas
|
2.44
|
2.96
|
2.95
|
0%
|
-21%
|
Dow-Jones
|
19,732
|
24,831
|
24,715
|
0%
|
25%
|
Most
recent GDP
|
2.1
|
2.3
|
2.3
|
0%
|
10%
|
Methodology
notes:
BTRTN calculates our
weekly approval ratings using an average of the four pollsters who conduct
daily or weekly approval rating polls: Gallup Rasmussen, Reuters/Ipsos and You
Gov/Economist. This provides consistent and accurate trending information and
does not muddy the waters by including infrequent pollsters. The outcome tends to mirror the RCP average
but, we believe, our method gives more precise trending.
For
the generic ballot, we take an average of the only two pollsters who conduct
weekly generic ballot polls, Reuters/Ipsos and You Gov/Economist, again for
trending consistency.
The Trumpometer aggregates a set of
economic indicators and compares the resulting index to that same set of
aggregated indicators at the time of the Trump Inaugural on January 20, 2017.
The basic idea is to demonstrate whether the country is better off economically
now versus when Trump took office. The indicators are the unemployment rate, the Dow-Jones Industrial Average, the Consumer
Confidence Index, the price of gasoline, and the GDP.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment