As Robert Mueller’s investigators advance on Donald Trump
like Patton’s Third Army across France, we pause to consider questions that might
seem arcane and remote now, but could suddenly become the center of national
debate should articles of impeachment actually be drafted. No doubt the single
most consequential issue is that of the status of one Mike Pence.
You know Mike. ABC captured his frosty stare at the Winter
Olympics as he tried to avoid any implication that he was colluding with Kim Yo Jung while she enjoyed her fifteen minutes of
fame a few seats down. Aside from that, he’s only been spotted lately on a few milk
cartons in Indiana, where at least they notice that he is MIA.
But that’s probably exactly the way Pence wants it now.
With a White House in a full-on Fukushima Daiichi meltdown that is sending
even the most entrenched White House staffers screaming for the exits, Mike
Pence is probably packing a metal detector to avoid accidentally running into a
microphone. Pence is no doubt aware of a fascinating fact: the Vice-President
is the only member of the Executive Branch who cannot be fired – directly or
indirectly -- by Donald Trump. So the way Mike is figuring things, all he needs
to do – and all he should do – is
keep his head down and let the meltdown melt. If Trump gets impeached, guess who
moves into the Oval Office? If Trump finally and irrevocably alienates
Republicans, who is best positioned to take over party leadership? And if Trump
can somehow stay in office for eight years, guess who is first in line for the
GOP 2024 nomination? No matter what, Mikey
likes it! The only thing that can screw things up for Mike Pence is if Mike
Pence gets quoted saying anything riskier than “the curling competition is
exciting,” and “since when are U.S. Olympic athletes allowed to be gay?”
But momentarily setting aside his deep seeded homophobia
and throwback misogyny, there are other very serious issues about being Mike
Pence.
Think about this: when Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton were
threatened by impeachment proceedings, their Vice-Presidents were galaxies away
from the problem. Gerald Ford had replaced the disgraced Spiro Agnew as
Vice-President in December, 1973, long after the Watergate break-in, and
already well into the burning investigation into a Presidential cover-up. Indeed, the legislators who acted on the 25th
Amendment to confirm the appointment of Gerald Ford as VP had a clear sense
that they were picking the next President of the United States. When Bill
Clinton was impeached in 1998, Vice President Al Gore was nowhere near the
Monica Lewinsky scandal, and had nothing to do with the lying under oath that
was the actual grounds for impeachment.
Both of these Vice Presidents were in excellent standing to assume the
Presidency if need be, as neither had the slightest stain from the scandals
emanating from the Oval Office.
Mike Pence, however, is in a very different situation. Start with the fact that Mike Pence is the
most senior person outside of the Trump family who has been continuously in
Trump’s inner circle since the Republican Convention. It is actually pretty
hard to say that you are Vice President of the United States, trusted advisor
to the President, head cheerleader in the photo op cabinet meetings, and still simultaneously
claim to be completely out of the loop on the most profound ongoing controversy
of the Trump administration.
Put most simply: if Donald Trump is served with articles of
impeachment based on evidence of fraudulent business activity, collusion with a
foreign government to undermine our elections, and/or obstruction of justice, is
it really possible that Mike Pence will prove to be wholly uninvolved
in every piece of evidence that Mueller’s team will bring to the table?
If, indeed, it is discovered that Mike Pence was present
during a discussion that is proffered as evidence of obstruction of justice,
how can he not be impeached as well,
simultaneously? If Mike Pence, the second most senior officer of government,
was in any way exposed to an act of obstruction and said and did nothing about
it, he is essentially a party to the cover-up. There is no such thing as “only
obstructing justice a tiny little bit.” You are innocent, or you are guilty.
And on which side of that line is Mike Pence?
We will start with the conjecture that Mike Pence’s plan to
steer clear of Mr. Mueller’s telescopic lens will be rooted in a claim of
comprehensive ignorance, Sergeant-Shultz-style (“I know nothing, nothing, Major Strasser!!”). Were Pence
to opt for what we can charitably call the “idiot defense,” I gotta tell you,
I’d be tempted to believe him. Mike
Pence appears to know nothing about a
great many things, so a blanket claim of willful ignorance about possible
Russian collusion and obstruction of justice would be spot-on with my image of
Vice President Intellectual Tabula Rasa.
Just look at this guy! Mike Pence has
that perpetually blank, empty gaze of a tenth grader who has fallen
irretrievably behind in a remedial geometry class. I have thirty-watt light
bulbs that emit more heat than Mike Pence. Google “Mike Pence Quotes” and you
get stuff like “The 25 Stupidest Quotes from Mike Pence.”
Unable to resist that particular search, I clicked and
found that number two was this epic combination smash-down on liberals,
Hollywood, and women in the military, in which Pence attempted to argue that
the Disney movie Mulan was an
intentional plot to subconsciously influence public opinion or order to
advocate for women to serve in the Armed Services. These are Mike Pence’s
actual words:
“I
suspect that some mischievous liberal at Disney assumes that Mulan’s story will
cause a quiet change in the next generation’s attitude about women in
combat...Many young women find many young men to be attractive sexually. Put
them together, in close quarters, for long periods of time, and things will get
interesting. Moral of the story: women in military, bad idea."
You see the point: if Mike Pence were to answer each and
every question under oath by pleading woeful ignorance and terminal stupidity,
the grand jury would find the testimony compelling and the evidence convincing beyond a reasonable doubt.
But Mike Pence is going to have a hard time claiming that for
a year and half he showed up long enough to pick up his bi-weekly pay stub as
Vice President and somehow managed to remain unaware of the raging inferno of legally
questionable maneuvers emanating from this White House.
Indeed, Mike Pence was at the epicenter of one of the
earliest and most glowing pieces of radioactive Russian collusion contamination
that has emerged to date. You’ll recall that when Michael Flynn was fired from
his role as National Security Director, it was not because he lied to the FBI. It was because he lied to Mike Pence.
Flynn had told Pence that he had not spoken about sanctions during a phone call
with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, which Pence repeated on Face the Nation on January 17, 2017. This,
in turn, prompted then Acting Attorney General Sally Yates to march over to
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and inform the White House that Flynn was lying and
therefore vulnerable to blackmail. So
Flynn was caught lying to Pence about the phone call, causing Pence to be embarrassed
by erroneously defended Flynn on television. Are we to understand that Pence
never stopped to say, “Hey, gang, WTF? Why was Flynn talking to Kislyak about
sanctions? What idiot told him to do
that?”
Good question, Mr. Vice President. Yes, it was that idiot.
Perhaps the most interesting tidbit about Mike Pence is
that he was actually one of the people who was told to “clear the room” – along
with the far more publicized hall loiterer, Jeff Sessions – while Donald Trump
asked only Comey to stay inside the Oval Office for the now famous February 14,
2017 meeting. It was after Sessions, Pence, and four other senior officials
were asked to clear the room that Trump allegedly asked Comey if he could “let
go” of the investigation into Flynn. Are we to believe that when Trump asked
for that private time that neither Sessions nor Pence knew why Trump excluded
them from the conversation? Are we expected to assume that once Comey emerged
from the meeting that Pence and Sessions had no discussion about the Comey
meeting with the President? When Pence finally heard Comey’s account of the
meeting in Congressional testimony, are we to assume that Pence never asked
Trump to give his account of the meeting?
The truth is that Mike Pence has been the Vice President
for fifteen months in an administration that manufactures lies like breakfast
sausage, that seeks to delegitimize the news industry, that targets our
minorities, tramples the Constitution, demeans and undermines our intelligence
agencies and has responded to a life-threatening attack on our democracy by
doing nothing. And what has Mike Pence done in those fifteen months? As far as
we can see, he’s watched a bunch of Norwegians win gold medals and hidden in
plain sight on the milk cartons of ethical abdication.
If Mueller indeed has something on Trump, the question will
inevitably become, “what does Pence know and when did he know it?” Robert
Mueller is proving to be running an investigation that is monumental in its
scope, meticulous in its research, and we have every reason to believe that
when he delivers his report, it will support its each and every allegation with
hard facts, first hand witnesses, and a compelling narrative with no stone
unturned.
There is, on the one hand, a
reasonable argument that Mike Pence was perceived to be such a mindless lackey that
even Donald Trump thought he was not worth confiding in.
And then, on the other hand, there are the known unknowns
and the unknown knowns. What if Flynn, Manafort, or Gates has already told Mueller
about a meeting on the Podesta emails that Mike Pence attended? Or what if Sessions
is subpoenaed and compelled to acknowledge that Trump told Pence and the Attorney
General exactly what he said to Comey? Or that an electronic calendar will
prove Pence attended a meeting that Mueller can prove to be toxic?
What if Mueller finds two
smoking guns, and all the NRA money in the world can’t save Trumpty Dumpty and
his trusty sidekick Indiana Drones?
The logic from here goes bonkers.
If both Trump and Pence are impeached in the House –
simultaneously convicted in the Senate of a “high crime or misdemeanor,” then
what exactly does that mean for Presidential succession? The process for succession outlined in the Twenty-Fifth
Amendment is contingent on there being either a sitting Vice President to
succeed a vacant presidency, or a sitting president to fill a vacancy in the vice-presidency.
With both offices vacant, the line of succession reverts to the traditional path,
which would mean that the Speaker of the House would become president. Should
articles of impeachment be introduced prior to election day, that would put
House Speaker Paul Ryan in the extremely awkward position of presiding over the
vote on articles of impeachment in which he
personally stands to gain the presidency as a result.
Or – crazier still – if impeachment and conviction take
place in 2019 with a newly-Democratic House of Representatives, then the first
female President of the United States could well be, uh, Nancy Pelosi. Somewhere out in flyover country the Tea Party
faithful just felt a tremor in the force worse than Obi Wan Kenobi felt when Alderaan
was blown to smithereens.
Just how farfetched is this particularly scenario?
Our sense is this: Robert Mueller strikes us as a guy who
is thinking through the implications of the possibilities of a stunning array
of scenarios. One such scenario is to realize how crippling it would be to the
United States of America to have a President impeached and removed, only to then
discover that his successor is tainted with criminal liability that also rises
to the level of a high crime or misdemeanor.
When Mueller finally plays his hand, he is going to want to
be able to say – definitively, and with no doubt – one of two things: Pence is
clean or… Pence is dirty.
And right now, it’s impossible to know which way that card
is going to get played.
All we can think now is that somebody in Mueller’s investigation
has probably already been given a crucial investigative assignment: What does
Pence know, and when did he know it?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment