Tom
with the “SaturData Review” which updates key political indicators and
highlights other pertinent info from the week.
In the annals of reassuring Presidential proclamations, the
top of the list surely goes to Richard Nixon’s infamous “I am not a crook”
statement that he uttered in a nationally televised press conference on
November 17, 1973. This was well before
he was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Watergate affair; before the
House of Representatives passed Articles of Impeachment; before the “smoking
gun” tape; before his resignation in disgrace and before his pardon by his
successor, Gerald Ford. All of those
subsequent events make a pretty convincing case that Nixon was, indeed, a
crook. At the time, though, before all that
happened, the fact that Nixon felt the need to make such a defense was
considered quite damning. And, of course,
his assurance turned out to be hollow indeed.
We now have a new contender for the top
spot, with Donald Trump’s own reassuring self-assessment that he is “a very
stable genius,” tweeted in response to revelations in the new Michael Wolff
book, “Fire and Fury” that make him appear to be quite unhinged. It is hard to imagine that this
self-diagnosis has provided much more comfort to anyone than did Nixon’s
self-defense. We shall see the verdict
of history in due course, if not soon enough.
The most recent polling cycles have now fully encompassed the
aftermath of the Wolff bombshells, and many of you will be disheartened to
learn that the revelations therein appear to have had very little effect on
Trump’s approval rating, which dropped only a point, to 42%, this week. Typically, a full week of national
conversation about the President’s mental competence and fitness for office might
be expected to have a disastrous impact on his numbers. But with Trump, not so much.
(A
note on methodology: BTRTN calculates our weekly approval ratings using an average of the four
pollsters who conduct daily or weekly approval rating polls: Gallup Rasmussen,
Reuters/Ipsos and You Gov/Economist. This provides consistent and accurate
trending information and does not muddy the waters by including infrequent
pollsters. The outcome tends to mirror
the RCP average but, we believe, our method gives more precise trending.)
Which might lead one to think that Trump calling Haiti and
Africa “shithole countries” might not do much damage either (we won't know until next week after the next round of polling). This disgraceful, racist characterization has
been denounced by all sides, and has dominated the news cycle unabated since
Trump uttered it Thursday afternoon in an Oval Office meeting. This was on top of a week in which Trump rather
stunningly indicated that he “probably” had a “good relationship” with Kim Jong
Un; sent out a tweet ripping a surveillance law called FISA that he was
supposed to be supporting and was up for a House vote that very day; ripped the
Obama Administration for moving the Embassy in London, when it was actually the
Bush administration that made the decision; and hosted a public meeting on
immigration with congressional leaders in which he contradicted himself repeatedly
and left little clarity on his “must haves” for the bill. He also responded to a simple question on
whether he would meet with Special Counsel Robert Mueller for an interview by
uttering the phrase “no collusion” seven times in a span of one minute and 27
seconds. The response made him sound,
well, unhinged.
The outright racism of the “shithole” comments – followed by
the outright lie in denying he made them (Dick Durbin and Lindsay Graham both
reaffirmed that he did indeed make them, and they were in the room) – may be
another matter. But then again, are
those outrageous comments really any worse than the “grab ‘em by the pussy”
Access Hollywood video that preceded by a mere month Trump’s election to the highest
office in the land? Charlottesville? The Mexican rapists? The bashing of Gold Star families? And so on?
Perhaps there simply is no “new low.” I keep thinking of the
roughly 15% of those voters who, as of now, “somewhat approve” of Trump – they
support him but clearly with reservations – and when they might flip. But I have my doubts they will do so based on
anything he says. These folks, at the outset, “strongly”
supported him but now are not as solid.
But words only seem to matter so much to this crew – and they hold the
keys to Trump’s continued GOP support. If he loses them, Trump is down into the 20’s
in the polls – and the GOP will flee him.
This week the “generic ballot” also dropped back a bit for
the GOP, with the Democratic lead inching upward from +7 to +8 points. Surely the GOP was hoping for more from the
tax legislation, and this gap is evidence of a coming Democratic “wave” if it
cannot be closed. Our model shows than
an 8-point gap would be enough to hand over the House majority to the
Democrats, especially with the North Carolina legislature being sent back to
the drawing board by a federal court to un-gerrymander their Congressional
districts that were found to be “invidiously” favoring the GOP. If the Supreme Court rules similarly this
term on another gerrymandering case, the Democratic wave could turn into a
tsunami.
SaturData Review
|
Jan 2017 Post-Inaug.
|
Wk ending Jan 6
|
Wk ending Jan 11
|
Change vs. Last Wk
|
Change vs. Jan 2017
|
Trump Approval
|
48%
|
43%
|
42%
|
-1 pp
|
-6 pp
|
Trump Disapproval
|
44%
|
54%
|
55%
|
+1 pp
|
+11 pp
|
Trump Net Approval
|
+4 pp
|
-11 pp
|
-13 pp
|
-2 pp
|
-17 pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generic Ballot Dem - Rep
|
D + 6
|
D + 7
|
D + 8
|
+1 pp
|
+2 pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trumpometer
|
0%
|
+18%
|
+19%
|
+1 pp
|
+19%
|
Unemployment
Rate
|
4.7
|
4.1
|
4.1
|
0%
|
13%
|
Consumer
Confidence
|
114
|
122
|
122
|
-6%
|
7%
|
Price
of Gas
|
2.44
|
2.64
|
2.64
|
0%
|
-8%
|
Dow-Jones
|
19,732
|
25,296
|
25,369
|
0%
|
29%
|
Most
recent GDP
|
2.1
|
3.2
|
3.2
|
0%
|
52%
|
Trump’s dismal approval rating is particularly shocking in
light of the strength of the economy, a condition that usually coincides with
approval ratings well north of 50%. That
Trump is not benefiting from the economy – whether he actually deserves any credit
for it, which most economists and Wall Street analysts’ dispute – should make
the White House shudder for what might happen when the inevitable correction
occurs.
POLITICAL STAT OF THE WEEK
Quinnipiac recently ran a poll that included the following question,
“What is the one word you would use to describe
President Trump's first year in office? The answers are below. The numbers are not percentages; the figures
show the number of times each response was given, and the table reports only
words that were mentioned at least five times.
The color-coding is by BTRTN – red is
a “bad” or negative adjective; green is a “good” or positive one, and yellow is
neither, that is, basically neutral or non-judgmental. You can debate our color codes, but if you
accept them, 59% of the words were “bad,” 31% “good” and 10% “neither.”
disaster
|
69
|
chaotic
|
62
|
successful
|
44
|
horrible
|
28
|
great
|
27
|
good
|
26
|
embarrassing
|
24
|
terrible
|
24
|
interesting
|
23
|
awesome
|
21
|
excellent
|
20
|
disappointing
|
19
|
failure
|
19
|
outstanding
|
15
|
incompetent
|
14
|
amazing
|
12
|
horrific
|
11
|
awful
|
10
|
different
|
10
|
disgraceful
|
10
|
disgusting
|
10
|
fantastic
|
10
|
surprising
|
10
|
challenging
|
9
|
joke
|
9
|
abysmal
|
8
|
dysfunctional
|
8
|
frightening
|
8
|
dangerous
|
7
|
erratic
|
7
|
idiotic
|
7
|
okay
|
7
|
appalling
|
6
|
crazy
|
6
|
satisfactory
|
6
|
scary
|
6
|
aggressive
|
5
|
catastrophe
|
5
|
change
|
5
|
childish
|
5
|
fair
|
5
|
hopeful
|
5
|
mediocre
|
5
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment