Shock and awe cascaded across Quicken Loans Arena last
night as it became clear to the throngs of Trumpublicans that Ted Cruz was not gonna do it. He was not
gonna endorse Donald Trump. The rage heretofore reserved for Barack Obama and
Hillary Clinton rained down on one of their own.
In one of the most dramatic moments in the history of
nominating conventions, Ted Cruz walked into Trump’s coronation, stood at the podium,
warmed up the crowd, led them on, and then – at just the perfect moment – stood
back and, for all intents and purposes, gave Donald Trump the finger.
Delivered unto the undisputed king of reality television,
there was a nice symmetry; instead of Trump’s signature “you’re fired,” Cruz
opted for the more heartfelt “f—k you.”
How this came to pass is a fascinating tale with many
moving parts: ambition, principle, personal loathing, revenge, miscalculation,
and simply incompetence. Let’s start with the latest organizational burp from the
not-yet-ready-for-primetime campaign.
How Trump’s team could invite his archrival to speak at the
convention without first gaining an absolute assurance of his fealty and
willingness to make an endorsement is the just the latest evidence of the
inexperience of the Trump campaign. In a week that included public hemming and
hawing over his VP choice, a DEFCON 2 plagiarism scandal and subsequent PR
fiasco, and a parade of amateurish B-list speakers, allowing Cruz to symbolically
flip Trump the bird qualifies as a second-tier
gaffe.
More broadly, how so many people could be stunned that Cruz
would not endorse Trump is in itself
breathtaking. For those Trumpublicans who felt outraged by this rude treatment,
let’s review the bidding.
All within the past four months, Donald Trump has…
- Implied that Ted Cruz’s father was involved in the assassination of John F. Kennedy
- Sent out a very unflattering picture of Heidi Cruz, and threatened to “spill the beans” on her. No one ever found out what exactly this referred to; Trump’s tweet sparked rumors of extramarital affairs. But it was classic Donald Trump… the implication of an impropriety without the slightest substantiation. It was pure, spiteful character assassination.
- Continuously referred to Cruz as “Lyin’ Ted.”
Now, let’s role-play for a moment, OK? Let’s pretend that
you and I are in a clear competition to be named head of GlobalCableCorp, Inc.
One day, I send out an “all-staff” email mentioning offhandedly that your
father is a murderer. The next day, I send out a second email, this time saying
that your spouse is doing it with six different personal trainers down at the
Equinox. Then, I begin a daily practice of sending out an email to all staff
saying that you are a pathological liar. Then I win the promotion to head of
GlobalCableCorp, and I invite you to come up to the Annual Meeting and tell all the
shareholders that I was the right pick for the job.
Donald Trump won the Republican nomination by serially
demeaning and humiliating his rivals with childish nicknames and disparaging
comments. Now he appears shocked! …shocked and stunned! … that a number of them want nothing to do with
him. Trump is genuinely taken aback that Cruz would seize this golden
opportunity on national television to shove a can of Lima beans up his
nostrils.
Now, the brutal insults to family alone are justification
for Cruz’s decision to not offer an endorsement. But that’s not even the half
of it. Ted had also had a long term calculus at work.
Cruz looked out ahead and realized that one of three things
is going to happen:
- Donald Trump will lose.
- Donald Trump will win, but fail in the job and become an unpopular President.
- Donald Trump will win and will be a great President
Cruz is betting that the odds of Trump opening Door number
3 are pretty low, and so Ted is lyin’ in wait for the far more likely Doors #1
and #2 to open. These are his doors of opportunity. (Plus, telegraphing to the
world that he thinks Trump will lose or fail is not the worst thing he could be
doing toward his own ends).
Door # 1: If Trump loses, Cruz wants to be able to say that
yet again, the Republicans failed – as they did in 2008 and 2012 – to nominate
a true conservative.
Door #2: If Trump wins and is unpopular, Cruz would relish the
opportunity to challenge this sitting President in the primaries, basing his
attack again on the contention that Trump’s failure as President is wholly due
to the fact that he never embraced true conservative principles and policies.
In either circumstance, once the election cycle of 2020
begins, Ted Cruz will now be able to say that he was the only candidate who
refused to cave in to Trump. He will be able to say that he – and he alone –
held true his belief in conservative principles, and that he has been
vindicated.
There’s no doubt that Cruz’s move is a high-risk strategy.
Should Clinton defeat Trump, many Republicans will permanently brand Cruz as a
Benedict Arnold who put his own ambition above the unifying goal of defeating
Clinton. Many will say he should have
followed the example of John Kasich, who chose not to attend his own party’s
convention in his own state rather than be perceived to be endorsing Trump.
Others will say that Cruz should have followed the example of Reagan, who was
beaten for the 1976 nomination by Gerald Ford after a brutal campaign… but who
ultimately fell in line and endorsed Ford. Cruz is hoping that by 2020, a
Republican party desperate to defeat a sitting President Clinton will have
forgotten his sin.
Elephants never forget.
One irony is that Cruz’s decision not to endorse overwhelmed
the fact that his speech had been a masterful articulation of conservative
principle. He provided a rigorous, thoughtful, and consistent articulation of
conservative dogma. It led him to some surprising positions; some at odds with
the Trumpublicans and the Party
Platform that had just been ratified.
In a convention filled with Hillary bashing, Ted Cruz
barely mentioned her. In a convention that just passed the most homophobic
platform in its history, Ted Cruz said that true conservatism means that the
Bill of Rights guarantees that lesbians, gays, bisexual, and transgender people
should have the freedom to live the life they were meant to lead. In a
convention that has thoroughly mourned the death of policemen, but never the victims
of cops acting outside the law, Ted Cruz was the first person at the convention
to say Alton Sterling’s name out loud.
Cruz even offered an intriguing pivot on that classic
liberal doctrine of “diversity,” turning it into a paean to state’s rights. His
point: people in Minnesota might think differently on an issue than people in
Idaho. Why don’t we acknowledge that “diversity” with greater local autonomy?
If not, he offered, “Why have states at all?”
Look, Ted Cruz is a smarmy, oily guy; he has done more than
his share of vicious and noxious bloviation in the course of this campaign.
But last night, he took a stand. He took a stand for his
family. He took a stand for his principles. He didn’t hide outside the arena,
mail it in from South Beach, or snootily sit in argyle socks in Kennebunkport
and whine to Bar’ about the good old days. He did not pretend that the
Republican Party had been unified.
In the face of a candidate who claims to tell it like it
is, Ted Cruz actually told it like it really
is. Teddy Roosevelt once wrote about “the man in the arena.” It’s worth
reviewing his words, inserting “Quicken Loans” in the appropriate places.
Now, after Day 3, and certain to be true by the close of
the convention, it is clear that the Republican Party is not the least bit
unified. It has become the Trumpublican party…
almost literally so. By far and away,
Donald Trump’s family has provided the only absolute, total, and unalloyed
endorsement of this candidate.
We’ve seen an array of party luminaries wanting none of
this convention: Bush, Bush, Bush, McCain, Romney. Basically, everyone who has
led this party the last 20 years.
Many of the most ardent Trump supporters are burnt out
Supernovas trying to pull stagnant careers out of nosedives. Chris Christie, Newt Gingrich, and new poodle
Mike Pence fall into this category.
Aside from the Trumps themselves, speakers have been happy
to talk about “making America great again;” they have been happy to talk about
being true conservatives, and they have
been happy to bash Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. CNN pointed out that in
the first two days of this convention, Hillary Clinton’s named had been
mentioned more often that Donald Trump’s by a factor of 20%.
Astronaut Eileen Collins spoke for five minutes and did not
even say Donald Trump’s name out loud. Not once.
Now we come to the great denouement, Thursday night… the
night Donald Trump offers his vision for America. For the fourth consecutive
night, Donald Trump will count on a member of his own family – this time,
daughter Ivanka – to make sure that there is at least one, thorough,
unqualified endorsement of his candidacy.
Donald Trump will offer his “law and order” message,
seeking to unify his anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, anti-Black Lives Matter,
anti-LGBT, misogynist campaign under a single banner last unfurled by Richard
Nixon, who used the office of the Presidency to trample on the rights of
citizens, only to resign in disgrace.
Ultimately, balloons will fall, and hands will be clasped
and raised.
But the illusion of unity has been popped and will deflate
like so many balloons on the floor of Quicken Loans Arena tomorrow morning.
In the end, the campaign that Donald Trump has run – of
disparagement, humiliation, character assassination, and a mountain of lies and
distortions – has come back to haunt him.
The faux Republican “unity” was blown to pieces last night
by the man that Donald Trump most thoroughly offended, Ted Cruz.
Last night, Ted Cruz took a stand that may have been
calculated for long term personal gain. Give him his due: it was a stand that
involved clear and present danger, and it may end up costing him his career. How
many people ever do that?
Of course, it could be that Ted Cruz playing three
dimensional chess when Trump is playing checkers. Cruz may have just been
gaming Trump to position himself for the future.
Maybe the guy does have 2020 foresight.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment