The Democratic race continues as an afterthought, the
result of both Hillary Clinton’s commanding delegate lead and Donald Trump’s
mesmerizing real-time rending of the Republican Party. But there is indeed a primary tomorrow, in
West Virginia, and we are duty bound to make a prediction. (We will no longer make predictions on the
GOP side, although those primaries continue tomorrow as well, in West Virginia
as well as in Nebraska.)
West Virginia is a difficult state for Hillary
Clinton. She once made the unfortunate observation,
while rather clumsily forwarding a clean energy agenda, that if she were
President she would “put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of
business.” She walked it back, she
apologized, but the fact is, like many so-called “gaffes” that politicians of
all stripes make, she probably meant it.
And coal-driven West Virginia is not about to forgive her. The polls show Bernie Sanders ahead in West
Virginia, though somewhat surprisingly by only single digit margins.
BTRTN
predicts that Bernie Sanders will win the West Virginia primary by a decent
margin. For Bernie and his
fans, the win will follow the familiar pattern:
a close win that yields pitifully few net delegates, hardly enough to
mount a serious threat to Clinton’s enormous delegate lead. Bernie might win, say, 20 delegates in West
Virginia to Clinton’s 17, a net of +3.
That would cut her pledged delegate lead from 290 to 287.
West
Virginia
|
BTRTN
Prediction
|
Sanders
|
54
|
Clinton
|
46
|
Over this election cycle, BTRTN has occasionally felt the
Burn from those who are Feeling the Bern.
We have faced some accusations from Bernie fans that we are biased in
favor of Hillary Clinton. In our minds,
nothing could be further from the truth – we call ‘em as we analyze ‘em. For us, our batting average is our ultimate
measure of success.
But we ran some numbers on ourselves and do indeed understand
where the pain comes from, and we have explanations.
There have been 42 Democratic contests so far that we have
predicted (all except Guam), and we have been correct on 35 of them. That’s an 83% batting average, pretty darn good. Of the seven races we got wrong, Bernie won six
when we had predicted the winner would be Hillary.
Here are the explanations for those seven misses:
- Michigan and Indiana were primary states where the polling indicated a Clinton win
- In Rhode Island, the minimal polling was mixed but we gave the nod to Clinton because of geography; she was favored in the other eastern primary states that day (Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware and Connecticut) and won them all as we predicted
- Then there were three early caucus states (Colorado, Minnesota and Kansas) where there was little to no polling, and, of course, caucuses are notoriously difficult to project from polling anyway. Hillary had won the first few caucuses (Iowa and Nevada) and thus was easy to peg as the favorite; once Bernie established his caucus prowess in those three states, our predictions got much better – we picked him to win the last eight caucuses and he did.
- And in Illinois, the polling favored Bernie and we called it for him, but Hillary pulled that one out
Overall in the 42 contests (on average) we predicted
Hillary would take 55% of the vote and Bernie 45%. Actually it came in 50% to 48%. Hillary bias?
No…lack of data. In the 28 primaries, where there generally is much
more polling, we predicted Hillary overall would win by a 58/42 margin, and it was
actually turned out to be 57/42. We were, clearly, exceptionally accurate in
the primaries; no bias there.
It was the caucuses that hurt us – Bernie did MUCH better
than we thought he would – we thought he would win most of them, but his margin
has been, on average, 62/37
instead of our predicted 52/48
in the 14 caucuses. But that wasn’t
bias; that was ignorance on our part!
Again, there is little to no polling data in caucus states, and polling
does not project well in a caucus environment.
But once Bernie got on a caucus roll, there was no stopping him, and we
called that.
Bottom line…our story has been the same since Super Tuesday. We predicted then that Hillary had an
insurmountable pledged delegate lead over Bernie and the race was effectively over. Because of the Democrat’s “proportionate
allocation” rule, after Super Tuesday, Bernie had to replicate his 20-point New
Hampshire win in large primary states to have a chance, and he has never done
that. When he wins, in those small state
caucuses and in a very few primaries (7 out of 28), he has only picked up a few
net delegates, not nearly enough to come close to overtaking Hillary. We have been saying this since Super Tuesday,
and we are still saying it, and it is looking more accurate every day.
And for those of you who still think Bernie has a chance to
win the nomination…we still predict otherwise.
Here are all 42 races, judge for yourself!
State
|
Primary/ Caucus
|
BTRTN
Prediction
|
Actual
|
Iowa
|
C
|
Clinton
50/46/4
|
Clinton
49.9/49.6
|
New
Hampshire
|
P
|
Sanders
57/43
|
Sanders
60/39
|
Nevada
|
C
|
Clinton
52/48
|
Clinton
53/47
|
S.
Carolina
|
P
|
Clinton
63/37
|
Clinton
74/26
|
Alabama
|
P
|
Clinton
73/27
|
Clinton
78/19
|
American
Samoa
|
C
|
Clinton
65/35
|
Clinton
68/26
|
Arkansas
|
P
|
Clinton
70/30
|
Clinton
66/30
|
Colorado
|
C
|
Clinton
51/49
|
Sanders
59/40
|
Georgia
|
P
|
Clinton
72/28
|
Clinton
71/28
|
Massachusetts
|
P
|
Clinton
53/47
|
Clinton
50/49
|
Minnesota
|
C
|
Clinton
60/40
|
Sanders
62/38
|
Oklahoma
|
P
|
Sanders
52/48
|
Sanders
52/42
|
Tennessee
|
P
|
Clinton
68/32
|
Clinton
66/32
|
Texas
|
P
|
Clinton
69/31
|
Clinton
65/33
|
Vermont
|
P
|
Sanders
87/13
|
Sanders
86/14
|
Virginia
|
P
|
Clinton
67/33
|
Clinton
64/35
|
Kansas
|
C
|
Clinton
53/47
|
Sanders
68/32
|
Nebraska
|
C
|
Sanders
55/45
|
Sanders
57/43
|
Louisiana
|
P
|
Clinton
70/30
|
Clinton
71/23
|
Maine
|
C
|
Sanders
54/46
|
Sanders
64/36
|
Michigan
|
P
|
Clinton
63/37
|
Sanders
50/48
|
Mississippi
|
P
|
Clinton
75/25
|
Clinton
83/17
|
Florida
|
P
|
Clinton
66/34
|
Clinton
65/33
|
Ohio
|
P
|
Clinton
53/47
|
Clinton
57/42
|
Illinois
|
P
|
Sanders
51/49
|
Clinton
51/49
|
N.
Carolina
|
P
|
Clinton
59/41
|
Clinton
55/40
|
Missouri
|
P
|
Clinton
51/49
|
Clinton
50/49
|
Arizona
|
P
|
Clinton
65/35
|
Clinton
58/40
|
Idaho
|
C
|
Sanders
52/48
|
Sanders
78/21
|
Utah
|
C
|
Sanders
52/48
|
Sanders
79/20
|
Washington
|
C
|
Sanders
54/46
|
Sanders
73/54
|
Alaska
|
C
|
Sanders
61/39
|
Sanders
82/18
|
Hawaii
|
C
|
Sanders
58/42
|
Sanders
70/30
|
Wisconsin
|
P
|
Sanders
53/47
|
Sanders
57/43
|
Wyoming
|
C
|
Sanders
72/56
|
Sanders
56/44
|
New
York
|
P
|
Clinton
55/45
|
Clinton
58/42
|
Pennsylvania
|
P
|
Clinton
56/44
|
Clinton
56/44
|
Maryland
|
P
|
Clinton
62/38
|
Clinton
63/33
|
Connecticut
|
P
|
Clinton
54/46
|
Clinton
52/46
|
Delaware
|
P
|
Clinton
54/46
|
Clinton
60/39
|
Rhode
Island
|
P
|
Clinton
51/49
|
Sanders
55/43
|
Indiana
|
P
|
Clinton
53/47
|
Sanders
52/48
|
As alway very interesting. Thank you for BTRTN, great evaluation on the US elections
ReplyDelete