The Donald Trump juggernaut encountered a bit of turbulence
this weekend, as Ted Cruz unexpectedly won the Kansas and Maine caucuses and
gave Trump a run for his money in the Louisiana primary and Kentucky caucus,
though Trump won both. Marco Rubio, who
otherwise had a disastrous showing in those four races, did manage to win the
Puerto Rico primary handily and swept all 23 votes.
But for all his efforts, Cruz only managed to pick up a net
16 delegates on Trump, garnering 69 to Trump’s 53. That is the problem with proportional
allocation, where wins make headlines but do not do much to close gaps. Trump still leads Cruz by 84 delegates.
What does this mean for Cruz? He has clearly established himself as the “alternative”
in this race, the clear number two to Trump, outclassing Rubio. He has now taken six states to Rubio’s two
(Minnesota and Puerto Rico), and has just about double Rubio’s delegates, 300
to 151.
But these results may actually be better news for Trump
than anyone. The assumption has been
that the way to beat Trump was to rally the establishment, with all of its
resources, money and clout, around Rubio, enabling him to go head-to-head with
Trump and dethrone him once most primaries move to a winner-take-all format on
March 15 – starting with a Rubio win in Florida. This may have been a fantasy all along (since
Trump is polling well ahead of Rubio in Florida) but at least it was a rational
plan. But the establishment cannot rally
around Cruz; in fact, they have a tough time determining which of Cruz or Trump
they hate more. The Rubio and Kasich
campaigns are both showing a very faint pulse, the last heartbeats of GOP
establishment favorites.
Is Cruz a threat to Trump?
Frankly, I don’t see it. Cruz has
proven to be a strong regional candidate who does well in caucuses, which are
low turnout affairs that favor the passionate wings of the parties and demand
strong organizations, which Cruz has. His
regional strength is apparent in his home state win in Texas, and wins in neighbor
Oklahoma and nearby Kansas. He also has
won caucuses in Iowa, Alaska and Maine.
But he must ultimately beat Trump in primaries that are outside of his
region, and that will be a major challenge.
The first test for him will come on Tuesday, in primaries
in Michigan and Mississippi. Trump has a
solid lead in virtually every poll in Michigan, and has been running roughly
40% to 20% over Cruz, with Kasich and Rubio also in the mix. Polling has been far lighter in Mississippi,
but Trump is up by 2 to 1 over Cruz in the only recent poll from last week. I sense that these poll margins will translate
to wins for Trump in both primaries, but I will await any last minute polls
tomorrow before making our projections.
Despite Cruz’s understandable calls for Rubio and Kasich to
exit, they will both almost surely stay in until their home state primaries on
March 15 (Florida and Ohio), though I suspect they will both exit if they do
not win those home states battles.
On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders won three races over
the weekend over Hillary Clinton, taking caucuses in Kansas, Nebraska and Maine
while Clinton won only the Louisiana primary.
Sanders is much like Cruz, a caucus winner based on the fervor of his
fellow lefties who get out to support him in low turnout events. But the math shows his struggle – despite winning
three out of four, he only picked up three net delegates, winning 66 to Clinton’s
63, and thus still trails her by a whopping 631 delegates. To have such a great weekend result in such a
minimal outcome in delegates underscores the virtually impossible nature of his
task in attempting to overtake Clinton.
BTRTN PROJECTIONS
The combination of minimal polling and seven of out the
nine races being caucuses did a number of us.
We forecast only five of the nine races correctly. We did extremely well in both Louisiana
primaries, and in Kentucky for the GOP and Nebraska and Maine for the
Dems. But Cruz and Sanders took the Kansas caucuses, and the Maine caucus and Puerto Rico primary were complete wash-outs.
State
|
Party
|
Candidate
|
Predict.
|
Actual
|
Abs. Diff
|
Pred. Rank
|
Act. Rank
|
Abs Rk Diff
|
March 5/6
|
Dem
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
0.3
|
Kansas
|
Dem
|
Clinton
|
53
|
32
|
20.7
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Kansas
|
Dem
|
Sanders
|
47
|
68
|
20.7
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Nebraska
|
Dem
|
Clinton
|
45
|
43
|
2.1
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Nebraska
|
Dem
|
Sanders
|
55
|
57
|
2.1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Louisiana
|
Dem
|
Clinton
|
70
|
71
|
1.1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Louisiana
|
Dem
|
Sanders
|
30
|
23
|
6.8
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Maine
|
Dem
|
Clinton
|
46
|
36
|
10.5
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Maine
|
Dem
|
Sanders
|
54
|
64
|
10.3
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
State
|
Party
|
Candidate
|
Predict.
|
Actual
|
Abs. Diff
|
Pred. Rank
|
Act. Rank
|
Abs Rk Diff
|
March 5/6
|
GOP
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
0.6
|
Kansas
|
GOP
|
Trump
|
38
|
23
|
14.7
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Kansas
|
GOP
|
Cruz
|
30
|
48
|
18.2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Kansas
|
GOP
|
Rubio
|
18
|
17
|
1.3
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
Kansas
|
GOP
|
Kasich
|
14
|
11
|
3.3
|
4
|
4
|
0
|
Kentucky
|
GOP
|
Trump
|
43
|
36
|
7.1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Kentucky
|
GOP
|
Cruz
|
25
|
32
|
6.6
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Kentucky
|
GOP
|
Rubio
|
24
|
16
|
7.6
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
Kentucky
|
GOP
|
Kasich
|
8
|
14
|
6.4
|
4
|
4
|
0
|
Louisiana
|
GOP
|
Trump
|
47
|
41
|
5.6
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Louisiana
|
GOP
|
Cruz
|
32
|
38
|
5.8
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Louisiana
|
GOP
|
Rubio
|
14
|
11
|
2.8
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
Louisiana
|
GOP
|
Kasich
|
7
|
6
|
0.6
|
4
|
4
|
0
|
Maine
|
GOP
|
Trump
|
32
|
33
|
0.6
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Maine
|
GOP
|
Cruz
|
15
|
46
|
30.9
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
Maine
|
GOP
|
Rubio
|
35
|
8
|
27.0
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
Maine
|
GOP
|
Kasich
|
18
|
12
|
5.8
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
Puerto Rico
|
GOP
|
Trump
|
34
|
14
|
20.4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Puerto Rico
|
GOP
|
Cruz
|
15
|
9
|
6.0
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
Puerto Rico
|
GOP
|
Rubio
|
32
|
74
|
41.8
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Puerto Rico
|
GOP
|
Kasich
|
19
|
1
|
17.6
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment