Tomorrow is “Tiny Tuesday,” which will feature, for both parties, a primary in Arizona and a caucus in Utah, plus a
Democratic caucus in Idaho. There are
not too many delegates at stake, but these contests are consequential nonetheless. Both Ted Cruz and Bernie Sanders have more or
less staked their candidacies on their potential to win in the West, and good
showings for them would provide some validation for their theses. Thus far, neither has shown much strength outside their home states and neighbors.
Polling is light but quite clear for the GOP. BTRTN
predicts that Ted Cruz will easily win the Utah caucus, while Donald Trump will
win the Arizona primary. It is hard
to ascertain from this whether Cruz has real legs in other Western states; what
it really proves it just how strong Cruz can be in caucus states where his
well-oiled machine of frenzied far right believers do a wonderful job out
getting out that difficult caucus vote.
It also may show just how much Mitt Romney hates Donald Trump’s guts and
how popular Romney is in Utah. Romney
issued an instantly famous favorable non-endorsement of Cruz in Utah, meaning that
he implored Utahans to vote for Cruz, but not as an endorsement, more simply to
deny Trump delegates. They seem to be
listening.
On the Democratic side, there is one recent poll in
Arizona, but only a single, stale month-old poll in each of Utah and Idaho,
which are both, as noted, caucus states.
The same dynamic behind Cruz’s strength in caucuses (frenzied,
well-organized ideologues) works for Sanders as well. BTRTN
predicts that Hillary Clinton will win the Arizona primary quite easily, while
Bernie Sanders will win close ones in the Utah and Idaho caucuses. This will mean little in terms of Bernie’s
attempt to overtake Clinton’s gargantuan delegate lead; in fact Clinton will
likely pick up 20+ net delegates. Even
as Bernie finds the West to be friendly, he can’t help but realize that his
delegate gap to Clinton most resembles one of the West’s most iconic symbols,
the Grand Canyon.
(Cue to Sanders zealots:
now comes the paragraph you want to cut and paste into your forum
comments and emails to fellow travelers.)
Bernie’s basic argument – the case he is making in the
media for the benefit of the superdelegates he needs to convince -- for staying
in the race, is three-fold: 1) if he
runs the table in the West, he may not close the delegate gap but he will have
more “momentum” than Clinton heading into the general election, 2) the FBI is
not investigating him, and thus there
will be no messy “October surprises” if Sanders tops the ticket, and, perhaps
most importantly, 3) most polls show that he is beating Trump, Cruz and Kasich
head-to-head by a wider margin than is Clinton.
This is true, and not by a little:
Avg. March Polls
|
Trump
|
Cruz
|
Kasich
|
Clinton versus
|
+8.4
|
+6.1
|
+0.5
|
Sanders versus
|
+12.1
|
+13.0
|
+9.5
|
(Bernie fans, stop here.)
Now, these head-to-head polls have limitations, at this
stage, to be sure. Sanders is still relatively
unknown nationally to the voting electorate, and the GOP has not yet begun attack and define him (as, say, a socialist), and they likely will never have to. He is far more of a blank slate than Hillary
Clinton.
More to the point, Clinton needs only 44% of the remaining
delegates to win the nomination, and given her track record and the looming New
York primary, that is virtually a lock.
The most recent poll in New York had her up 71/23. If she wins New York by that proportion, then
she will need only 39% of the rest of the delegates to lock it up.
Here are our predictions:
March 22 GOP
|
Arizona
|
Utah
|
Delegates >>
|
58
|
40
|
Primary/Caucus
|
P
|
C
|
Trump
|
46
|
24
|
Cruz
|
34
|
54
|
Kasich
|
20
|
22
|
March 22 DEM
|
Arizona
|
Utah
|
Idaho
|
Delegates >>
|
85
|
37
|
27
|
Primary/Caucus
|
P
|
C
|
C
|
Clinton
|
65
|
48
|
48
|
Sanders
|
35
|
52
|
52
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment