There are so many storylines coming out of Saturday’s
results from Nevada (D) and South Carolina (R) it is hard to know where to
begin. But I think there is one story
that rises above all the others, and it is getting surprisingly little
play. Sure, Hillary won some redemption,
Bernie proved he could be a true national candidate, Bush dropped out, and
Rubio and Cruz will now argue over who came in second.
But the story is Donald Trump and his firm grip on the GOP
nomination. At this point, given his
double digit win in South Carolina, he is in control, the presumptive favorite
to top the GOP ticket this fall. And he
seems impervious to two of the usual derailers, the disastrous gaffe and the notorious
flip-flop.
THE GOP IN SOUTH CAROLINA
What didn’t Trump do or say over the last week that would
have sent a traditional candidate packing?
He shattered Reagan’s so-called 11th Commandment (“thou shalt
not speak ill of any fellow Republican”) countless times, calling Ted Cruz an
outright liar. He took on the Bush
family in South Carolina, where they are venerated, and in the baldest terms,
blaming W for 9/11 and accusing him, too, of lying about WMD in Iraq. He took on the Pope (“for a religious leader
to question a person’s faith is disgraceful”), admittedly after the Pope
sideswiped him first. Old video emerged
in which he declared he was pro-choice (“I am pro-choice in every respect”),
and evidence also emerged that he was for the Iraq War before he was against
it.
And he came through it all without a scar, and with an easy
win over Rubio and Cruz. Unless John
Kasich can make an unlikely recovery in the Midwest in early March, we are,
indeed, down to a three-person race. Or
a one-person race? Trump should win
Nevada comfortably on Tuesday, and will be in excellent position for Super
Tuesday on March 1. By March 15 the GOP
will have elected 60% of its delegates. It
is hard to imagine the Trump steamroller somehow being stopped by then.
The Bush exit will go down as one of the largest comedowns
in the history of campaigns. Jeb Bush
was blessed with everything: the name
(yes, both Bush 41 and Bush 43 are quite popular now, with approval ratings of
63% and 53% according to Gallup in 2014), the money, the organization and the
establishment support. He is widely known
and lauded as a policy wonk, with a fine track record as Governor of Florida. And yet, in the end, he simply ran at the
exact wrong time. Sure he is a lousy
campaigner and a fairly rotten debater, but I feel pretty confident he would
have trounced Mitt Romney in 2012.
THE DEMOCRATS IN NEVADA
That giant breathing noise you just heard was a huge sigh of
relief from the Clinton camp. While Nevada
was not a “must win” for Hillary Clinton (that would be South Carolina), it was
a badly need win nonetheless, similar to Iowa in many respects. Sanders was coming on strong, and the notion
that he could inject a massive youth-driven turnout into a sleepy caucus
process and win it was a strong possibility. That
Clinton held Bernie off and took a six-point win was important for the “narrative”
heading into South Carolina.
That said, like Iowa, it was a win for Bernie, too. In Nevada he demonstrated his appeal in a
state that did not know him well, and his ability to turn the race for the
nomination into a long slog. Clinton had
surely once hoped to be crowned after Super Tuesday and that will not
happen. Bernie won’t win the South but
he has enough appeal, support and money to sustain him for months and months. In many respects, after Super Tuesday we will
be back to 2008 – with a clear frontrunner and a dogged pursuer. My sense is that Bernie in 2016 will play the
role of Hillary in 2008, and lose in the long run (with Hillary assuming the
Obama role). Hillary needs to keep
winning enough to keep her massive super delegate lead intact. Big wins in the South will do that.
OUR PROJECTIONS
This is no time to be modest – we at BTRTN are in the election
prediction business and we had another exceptional day. Save for 1,700 more votes for Kasich, we
would have run the table on the rankings and were more than respectable on the
percentages. All in all, we have been
pretty dead on for all six races thus far (more on that below).
South Carolina (R)
|
BTRTN Prediction
|
Actual
|
Trump
|
28
|
33
|
Rubio
|
23
|
22
|
Cruz
|
18
|
22
|
Bush
|
12
|
8
|
Kasich
|
13
|
8
|
Carson
|
6
|
7
|
|
|
|
Nevada (D)
|
BTRTN Prediction
|
Actual
|
Clinton
|
52
|
53
|
Clinton
|
48
|
47
|
Now the two parties flip, with the GOP up on Tuesday with
their Nevada caucus, and the Dems following on Saturday with their South
Carolina primary, where Hillary Clinton will look for her first sizable win. We’ll be back for each.
*************************************
For those of who are wondering how our forecasting results
look overall, we have made a total of 32 projections in 2016, one for each
competing candidate across the six races that have occurred. We have called the winner of all six races
correctly (better than Nate Silver!) and are off an average of a mere two percentage
points per candidate projection. And
we’ve also done well on rankings, off a half a rank on average. Here are each of the 32 projections, if you
care to peruse them.
State
|
Party
|
Candidate
|
Predict.
|
Actual
|
Abs. Diff
|
Pred. Rank
|
Act. Rank
|
Abs Rk Diff
|
ALL
|
|
ALL 32
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
0.5
|
IOWA
|
DEM
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
0.0
|
Iowa
|
Dem
|
Clinton
|
50
|
50
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Iowa
|
Dem
|
Sanders
|
46
|
50
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Iowa
|
Dem
|
O'Malley
|
4
|
0
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
IOWA
|
GOP
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
0.7
|
Iowa
|
GOP
|
Cruz
|
25
|
28
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Iowa
|
GOP
|
Trump
|
24
|
24
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Iowa
|
GOP
|
Rubio
|
22
|
23
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
Iowa
|
GOP
|
Carson
|
7
|
9
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
0
|
Iowa
|
GOP
|
Paul
|
5
|
5
|
0
|
5
|
5
|
0
|
Iowa
|
GOP
|
Bush
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
6
|
6
|
0
|
Iowa
|
GOP
|
Fiorina
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
10
|
7
|
3
|
Iowa
|
GOP
|
Kasich
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
8
|
8
|
0
|
Iowa
|
GOP
|
Huckabee
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
6
|
9
|
3
|
Iowa
|
GOP
|
Christie
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
8
|
10
|
2
|
Iowa
|
GOP
|
Santorum
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
11
|
11
|
0
|
NH
|
DEM
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
0.0
|
NH
|
Dem
|
Sanders
|
57
|
60
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
NH
|
Dem
|
Clinton
|
43
|
39
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
NH
|
GOP
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
0.6
|
NH
|
GOP
|
Trump
|
32
|
35
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
NH
|
GOP
|
Kasich
|
16
|
16
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
NH
|
GOP
|
Cruz
|
14
|
11
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
NH
|
GOP
|
Bush
|
12
|
11
|
1
|
5
|
4
|
1
|
NH
|
GOP
|
Rubio
|
15
|
11
|
4
|
3
|
5
|
2
|
NH
|
GOP
|
Christie
|
4
|
8
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
0
|
NH
|
GOP
|
Fiorina
|
4
|
4
|
0
|
6
|
7
|
1
|
NH
|
GOP
|
Carson
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
8
|
8
|
0
|
NEVADA
|
DEM
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
0.0
|
Nevada
|
Dem
|
Clinton
|
52
|
53
|
0.7
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Nevada
|
Dem
|
Sanders
|
48
|
47
|
0.8
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
SC
|
GOP
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
0.3
|
S. Carolina
|
GOP
|
Trump
|
29
|
33
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
S. Carolina
|
GOP
|
Rubio
|
22
|
22
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
S. Carolina
|
GOP
|
Cruz
|
18
|
22
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
S. Carolina
|
GOP
|
Bush
|
12
|
8
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
1
|
S. Carolina
|
GOP
|
Kasich
|
13
|
8
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
S. Carolina
|
GOP
|
Carson
|
6
|
7
|
1
|
6
|
6
|
0
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment