Look out! Election Day is one year away...and look to the right if you want an even more precise countdown!
The
verdict after the October 28th GOP debate was swift and clear: Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz “won” the debate,
and Jeb Bush “lost” it. The pundits were
unanimous. Social media’s verdict was
the same. Instant debate polling, both
scientific and otherwise, also supported the storyline.
But
do the numbers that really count – pre-debate versus post-debate polling – bear out
these conclusions? Yes, in part.
Rubio and Cruz showed the largest pre/post gains, with Cruz picking up
three points in each of the national, Iowa and New Hampshire polls (see chart
below). Rubio did about the same in Iowa
and New Hampshire, though with little change nationally. So they, indeed, clearly “won.”
Jeb
Bush lost a point nationally and in Iowa, and two points in New Hampshire. This is far better than one might have
expected given the savaging of his performance.
Bush’s problem is not that the debate was a disaster, it is that he is trending
in single digits and needs the kind of debate performance that will propel him
upward. So he lost in the sense that treading
water is unacceptable at this point.
But
there were other clear winners and losers as well that received little
attention.
Chris
Christie and John Kasich did very well in New Hampshire, rising +4 and +3
points respectively, in the state in which they have each pushed in all of their
chips. They took a big bite out of
Donald Trump, who lost 8 points in the Granite State, and that overall race
appears to have tightened considerably.
Carly
Fiorina was a loser. Her debate
performance was off her A Game, exhibited in the first two debates, which had
propelled her into the conversation. She
lost two points both nationally and in New Hampshire, and has squandered the
momentum she generated over the last two months. Her weakest moments were two particular
claims: “I can assure you: I am Hillary Clinton’s worst nightmare.” Really?
I seriously doubt it. I think
Hillary’s worst nightmare for 2016 has something to do with Bubba.
And
Ben Carson took a hit in Iowa, losing 4 points, and is now tied with Trump in
the low ‘20’s, with Cruz and Rubio looming larger in their rear view mirror.
Here
are the various gains and losses by each candidate (I eliminated the lesser
candidates, none of whom moved significantly from their positions in the nether
region of single digits everywhere):
PERCENTAGE
POINT CHANGE IN POLLS:
|
||||
Pre-debate
versus Post-debate polls
|
||||
NAT'L
|
IOWA
|
NH
|
TOTAL
|
|
Cruz
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
9
|
Rubio
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
8
|
Christie
|
0
|
2
|
4
|
6
|
Kasich
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
Huckabee
|
-1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Carson
|
1
|
-4
|
2
|
-1
|
Paul
|
0
|
-1
|
-1
|
-2
|
Fiorina
|
-2
|
0
|
-2
|
-4
|
Bush
|
-1
|
-1
|
-2
|
-4
|
Trump
|
-1
|
4
|
-8
|
-5
|
And
here are the latest absolute numbers (from which the above chart was derived). And the bottom line is, with two and a half
months until Iowa, Donald Trump remains on top.
He is still leading the national field comfortably, has regained a tie
in Iowa, and while slipping in New Hampshire, remains atop that field too. So perhaps, from this overall standpoint, he
won something in the debate as well. And
that is, credibility as the party nominee.
Could he win the GOP nomination?
At this point, anything can happen….including that.
NATIONAL
|
Oct '15
|
Post-debate
|
IOWA
|
Oct '15
|
Post-debate
|
NH
|
Oct '15
|
Post-debate
|
||
Trump
|
29
|
28
|
Carson
|
28
|
24
|
Trump
|
30
|
22
|
||
Carson
|
20
|
21
|
Trump
|
20
|
24
|
Carson
|
14
|
16
|
||
Rubio
|
9
|
10
|
Rubio
|
10
|
13
|
Rubio
|
8
|
12
|
||
Cruz
|
6
|
9
|
Cruz
|
9
|
12
|
Kasich
|
8
|
11
|
||
Bush
|
8
|
7
|
Bush
|
7
|
6
|
Cruz
|
5
|
8
|
||
Fiorina
|
6
|
4
|
Fiorina
|
5
|
5
|
Bush
|
9
|
7
|
||
Huckabee
|
4
|
3
|
Jindal
|
3
|
3
|
Christie
|
3
|
7
|
||
Paul
|
3
|
3
|
Huckabee
|
2
|
3
|
Fiorina
|
8
|
6
|
||
Christie
|
3
|
3
|
Christie
|
1
|
3
|
Paul
|
4
|
3
|
||
Kasich
|
3
|
3
|
Paul
|
3
|
2
|
Huckabee
|
1
|
1
|
||
Jindal
|
1
|
1
|
Kasich
|
2
|
2
|
Jindal
|
0
|
1
|
||
Santorum
|
1
|
0
|
Santorum
|
1
|
1
|
Pataki
|
0
|
1
|
||
Graham
|
1
|
0
|
Graham
|
0
|
1
|
Graham
|
1
|
0
|
||
Pataki
|
0
|
0
|
Gilmore
|
0
|
0
|
Santorum
|
1
|
0
|
||
Gilmore
|
0
|
0
|
Pataki
|
0
|
0
|
Gilmore
|
0
|
0
|
||
Other/NA
|
6
|
8
|
Other/NA
|
9
|
1
|
Other/NA
|
8
|
5
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment