We turned
the corner at Labor Day and the campaigns for the congressional elections have moved
into high gear. The clock is ticking
down to Election Day….look directly to your right for the exact countdown, at
eight weeks and less than a day as this is posted. I call your attention to my latest Senate and
House updates at these links; look for my first projections for the
gubernatorial races later this week:
I will be
updating these with greater frequency as we get closer, particularly in
October. Stay tuned…
The
political cycle for the month was dominated by ISIS and Ferguson ,
Missouri , as well as increased bellicosity by
the Russians as they sent troops across the Ukraine border. The ISIS beheadings of two American
journalists was a clear challenge by the abhorrent radical Islamists to
President Obama, designed to goad the U.S. back into the fight. Obama’s measured response is to aim to
“degrade and destroy” ISIS through a coalition; to fight them with U.S.
airpower in the sky, sovereign Iraqi and Syrian troops on the ground, and
plenty of support from Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Turkey as well as the U.K. and
other western allies. It is
strategically sound but practically very difficult, since the home team armies
are extremely weak. But the strategy is
welcome in the wake of Obama’s very unfortunate “we don’t have a strategy yet”
gaffe. While Obama was clearly referring
narrowly to the process of formulating military options to counter ISIS within the Syrian border, it was gleefully
misunderstood by the right as being symptomatic of a supposedly ill-defined and
weak foreign policy.
Obama was
coalition-building in the Ukraine
as well. Putin does not play by any
rules except of his own making, and the West is hard-pressed, beyond economic
sanctions that at some point damage Western interests as well, to counter his
belligerence. Ukraine is simply not a NATO ally,
and the notion of sending troops to defend its border is a non-starter. Instead, the focus is on upping other forms
of military support for Ukraine and communicating a clear intention to protect
NATO allies, such as the Balkan states, if they, too, are threatened by the
Russians.
I find
myself feeling the same way about Obama’s responses to these crises as I have
felt about the administration’s entire performance: I generally agree with the substance but am
aghast at the communication. Or: it
ain’t the meat, it’s the promotion. From
health care forward, Obama has not found his voice, except for singular, moving
events such as Newtown or Gabby Giffords (and Ferguson to a lesser
extent.) But those events provide
comfort only in their immediacy; he cannot seem to ever get it right on his more
enduring policies. If I were Obama, I
would bring David Gergen back to the White House for the umpteenth time, a wise
old hand who has served both parties admirably.
I doubt we would be discussing the “optics” quite so much.
And on the
other hand, I continue to be struck by the lack of imagination and
forward-thinking in the Republican campaign themes of 2014. After all the nation has been through in the
past 14 years, it is hard to fathom the GOP believing that their standard
themes still resonate to anyone other than Tea Party die-hards. In particular, the politics of exclusion is a
disastrous course given the demographic makeup of the country; an agenda that
is unwilling to rethink immigration and gun control and continues to press for
limits to woman’s rights and gay rights simply is not a good way to win
national elections.
In our
gerrymandered world, the Tea Party agenda will help the GOP keep the House, and,
with so many sparsely populated red states, possibly swipe the Senate in
2014. But the Republicans cannot win Presidential elections with this
approach. And thus, the GOP will “lose”
the Supreme Court soon enough. And even
if the Senate is lost, the Democrats will quickly retake it in 2016 – the
lineup of 2016 elections coupled with the always high-turnout Presidential
election practically guarantees it . And
with the nation, via minority growth projections, inexorably turning blue,
inevitably the Democrats will take control of the House.
The GOP
candidate who dares to venture down a more moderate path – think Marco Rubio on
immigration reform, or Rand Paul on gay rights – is quickly smacked down. The primary process simply will not accept
moderation in any form, and this is the GOP plight.
ECONOMETER
The
Econometer continued to rise, again to a new level, +72.5, and each component
measure has improved since Election Day 2012, when the Econometer was set to
zero. (And it is well ahead of the reading
on Obama’s 2009 Inauguration Day, when it was -72.5.) Consumer confidence rose again to 92.4, and
the update of second quarter GDP was an upward revision to an even more robust
+4.2% growth. The jobs report from last
week was somewhat disappointing at +142,000, but this was not seen as a setback
per se. The Dow remained strong, ending
over 17,000 last Friday. But the
Democrats have had difficulty translating the story of positive economic
momentum into a campaign plus, in part due to stagnant household incomes.
Econometer
|
Election Day 2012
|
8-Jun
|
6-Jul
|
4-Aug
|
8-Sep
|
Econometer
|
0.0
|
56.0
|
59.0
|
72.5
|
74.9
|
Unemployment Rate
|
7.9
|
6.3
|
6.1
|
6.2
|
6.1
|
Consumer Confidence
|
73.1
|
84.8
|
85.2
|
90.9
|
92.4
|
Price of Gas
|
3.71
|
3.75
|
3.77
|
3.69
|
3.56
|
Dow Jones
|
13,330
|
16,617
|
16,882
|
16,990
|
16,825
|
GDP
|
3.1
|
-1.0
|
-2.9
|
4.0
|
4.2
|
PRESIDENT
OBAMA APPROVAL RATING
As
mentioned, President Obama’s approval rating held at a net -9. For all the talk of a difficult summer for
the President, his approval rating has held above 40%. Every prior post-WWII president except JFK
has seen his approval rating tumble into the 30’s and even the 20’s (Nixon,
Carter and both Bushes), so Obama’s relative unpopularity actually remains well
above the norm.
Obama Approval
Rating
|
Election Day 2012
|
8-Jun
|
6-Jul
|
4-Aug
|
8-Sep
|
Approve
|
49.6
|
45.6
|
43.6
|
43.5
|
43.2
|
Disapprove
|
47.4
|
50.5
|
52.2
|
52.8
|
52.2
|
Net
|
2.2
|
-4.9
|
-8.6
|
-9.3
|
-9.0
|
GENERIC
BALLOT
Republicans
bounced back modestly in the generic ballot polling for the month, though the
Democrats remain a bit ahead. This is a
key variable in the brand new BTRTN’s regression regression equation,
introduced in House Update cited above (see: http://www.borntorunthenumbers.com/2014/08/house-2014-election-update-dems-sure.html
) and it suggests minimal changes in the composition of the House coming out of
the November election.
Generic Ballot
|
Election Day 2012
|
8-Jun
|
6-Jul
|
4-Aug
|
8-Sep
|
Democrat
|
46.3
|
42.2
|
41.0
|
44.8
|
41.5
|
Republican
|
46.0
|
41.5
|
39.1
|
42.3
|
41.0
|
Net
|
0.3
|
0.7
|
1.9
|
2.5
|
0.5
|
OBAMACARE
Obamacare
has fallen off the radar for most Republican candidates (and accordingly, the
polling services as well). The two polls
in the last month show a substantial narrowing of the net negative for
Obamacare, now roughly -10%, the lowest since last November (which was just at
the start of the website launch debacle).
It appears that premiums are not going to rise by an ungodly amount, and
thus will not be a good election issue for the GOP.
Obamacare
|
Election Day 2012
|
8-Jun
|
6-Jul
|
4-Aug
|
8-Sep
|
For/Favor
|
40.0
|
40.1
|
41.2
|
39.5
|
42.0
|
Oppose/Against
|
50.8
|
51.7
|
53.8
|
58.0
|
52.5
|
Net
|
-10.8
|
-11.6
|
-12.6
|
-18.5
|
-10.5
|
2016 PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATES
There were
no new polls to speak of for the 2016 presidential race, and the two fields
could not differ more. Hillary Clinton
dominates the Democratic field, while the GOP has no breakout candidate among
the many potential contenders.
2013
|
2013
|
2014
|
2014
|
2014
|
|
Jan-Oct
|
Nov/Dec
|
Q1
|
Q2
|
Jun/Jul
|
|
59
|
67
|
67
|
69
|
63
|
|
Biden
|
13
|
11
|
10
|
13
|
10
|
6
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
10
|
|
Cuomo
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
O'Malley
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Schweitzer
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
A/O or N/A
|
16
|
10
|
11
|
6
|
11
|
2013
|
2013
|
2014
|
2014
|
2014
|
|
Jan-Oct
|
Nov/Dec
|
Q1
|
Q2
|
Jun/Jul
|
|
Paul
|
13
|
14
|
12
|
14
|
11
|
Huckabee
|
13
|
13
|
14
|
12
|
11
|
Christie
|
16
|
19
|
12
|
11
|
11
|
Bush
|
12
|
10
|
12
|
13
|
10
|
Ryan
|
14
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
9
|
Perry
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
5
|
9
|
Cruz
|
10
|
12
|
8
|
7
|
8
|
Rubio
|
14
|
9
|
8
|
7
|
7
|
3
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
|
Santorum
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
Jindal
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
Other/N.A.
|
2
|
5
|
9
|
12
|
15
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment