How about a little break from politics for some baseball? Time for an update on the Yankees, and how to explain their 47-47 record at the All Star break.
The
conventional wisdom is that the Yankees have suffered mostly from the loss of
three starters – Sabathia, Pineda and Nova -- for most of the season, replaced
by the underwhelming trio of Phelps, Nuno and Whitley.
But that is
actually not true. It’s not the starting
pitching that has left the Yanks five behind a decent but hardly commanding
Oriole team. It’s the hitting.
Based on my
regression model, I had the Yankees down to win 89 games this year and be very competitive
in an AL East where no one would win 90.
My regression model requires only two variables: estimates of team OPS and team ERA. Those estimates are built up from
player-by-player estimates of playing time (plate appearances or innings
pitched) and individual OPS and ERA. (See: http://www.borntorunthenumbers.com/2014/04/yankees-2014-preview-is-it-2009-again-i.html
)
I had the
Yankees achieving a 3.82 ERA and in fact they have a 3.95 ERA, only 3%
off. Whereas they are 7% off my
projection for a .747 OPS, at .694.
The Yanks
have won 47 games thus far, where my 89 win projection would prorate to 52 wins
after 94 games. So we have to explain
who is accountable for the 5 lost wins.
But
actually, to confuse matters, the Yanks have actually won more games than they
“should have” by virtue of their stats.
Whether one uses my equation – which says they “deserve” only 43 wins to
date, or ESPN’s “Expected Won Loss” measure based on runs scored differential,
which has the Yanks at 44 wins, they have overachieved, much as they did last
year. (I am happy to speculate this
overachievement is attributable to a very strong bullpen, which enables the
team to win close games, while their losses are by a larger margin, a tendency
which tends to lead statistical projections a bit astray).
So, the question I seek to answer
is, if the Yanks have “earned” only 44 wins, when my preseason forecast said
they should have 52 wins, who is accountable for the 8 wins they are short?
Running the
numbers through my model yields a clear answer.
|
+/-
|
|
Reasons:
|
Wins
|
Performance vs. Expectations
|
Beltran/McCann/Soriano/Ellsbury/Jeter
worse OPS than expected
|
-6
|
.695 OPS vs. .792
|
Sabathia/Nova/Pineda/Kuroda
worse ERA/less IP than expected
|
-3
|
4.57 ERA vs. 3.74; 24% of IP vs. 37%
|
Other
hitters worse than expected
|
0
|
.711 OPS vs. .712
|
Original
relievers pitched better than expected
|
1
|
3.11 ERA vs. 3.58
|
Substitute
relievers pitched worse than expected
|
-1
|
4.43 ERA vs. 3.75
|
Tanaka has
pitched better/more than expected
|
2
|
2.51 ERA vs 3.50; 15% of IP vs. 11%
|
TOTAL
|
-8
|
|
Yes, the
Yanks have missed those injured starters, but the fact of the matter is, the
backups have pitched pretty well, and my expectations for CC and Pineda were
not all that great to begin with. Phelps,
Whitley, Greene, Nuno and McCarthy have a combined 4.46 ERA versus my
expectation for CC, Nova and Pineda which was 3.46. That differential is essentially worth about
3 wins, which is certainly material. (Kuroda is doing about what I expected.)
But the far
bigger impact has been the poor hitting of Beltran, McCann, Soriano, Ellsbury
and Jeter, who have collectively hit to a .695 OPS versus my reasonable expectation
for .792 based on their performance in the recent past (see the chart below). Given the five veterans accounted for 44% of
the Yankees total plate appearances, their relatively poor hitting has cost the
club about six wins.
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2014
|
OPS
|
Actual
|
Actual
|
Actual
|
Plan
|
Actual
|
McCann
|
0.817
|
0.698
|
0.796
|
0.800
|
0.671
|
Jeter
|
0.743
|
0.791
|
0.542
|
0.725
|
0.647
|
Ellsbury
|
0.928
|
0.682
|
0.781
|
0.800
|
0.746
|
Soriano
|
0.759
|
0.821
|
0.791
|
0.800
|
0.611
|
Beltran
|
0.910
|
0.842
|
0.830
|
0.830
|
0.671
|
The other
hitters have been just slightly below expectations, and the relievers have
collectively been on target, with the spectacular Betances and excellent Warren offsetting the
atrocious performance of a bunch of stopgaps, starting with Alfredo Aceves,
Matt Daley and Jose Ramirez, along with a forgettable assortment one or two
inning guys (Cesar Cabral? Wade
LeBlanc?) who bombed their auditions.
And, of
course, there is Tanaka, who exceeded my expectations (3.50 ERA and about 92
innings pitched) by a wide margin (2.51 and 129); he contributed two more wins
than expected all by himself with his sensational first half.
As for the
second half of the season? Typically one might expect veterans off to poor
starts to rebound, but Soriano has already been released, Beltran is
continually injured, Jeter has been consistently in the .650 OPS range all
year, and McCann seems spooked by the shift.
Only Ellsbury may have some upside, but he was off only 7% of OPS, while
the others are off by double figures.
Tanaka’s
injury is particularly devastating, and there is no replacement. Despite their miraculous proximity to the AL
East lead, the Yanks have to ask themselves if they are willing to gut their
relatively weak minor league system for a veteran starter or two.
Absent
major changes, my model indicates the Yanks will modestly improve both their
OPS and ERA, with some improvement from the veteran bats and more stability in
the rotation provided by McCarthy, Greene and perhaps one other decent new
arm. A .721 team OPS and 3.78 team ERA
translates “by the book” to a .520 W-L percentage, or 35 wins in the last 68
games. Let’s give Joe three more wins on
top of that for his game (bullpen) management and perhaps some Cashman upgrades. That brings us to 38 wins in the last 68
games, plus the current 47 wins at the break…and the Yanks make it in with 85
wins. Not enough to win the AL East or a
wild card, but respectable given the injury debacle. And bad enough for Cashman to tear up last
winter’s blueprint and devise another – if he’s rehired.
When you have irrational owners/fans, it causes the people in charge (Cash-Man!) to make bad decisions.....Spending that much on McCann, Ells and Beltran was bound to come back and haunt the Trust Fund Twins (say hi, Hal and Hank). The fact that it's dooming them this early is a disaster for NYY. They're stuck with 3 guys who are only going to get worse.
ReplyDelete