(Note: You can now like BornToRunTheNumbers on Facebook...and
follow us on Twitter...)
Late in
2013 I had the opportunity to ask (separately) both Joe Scarborough (of
“Morning Joe”) and John Heilemann (co-author of the “Game Change” series on the
2008 and 2012 Presidential elections) the same question: how could Chris Christie, as a northeastern
quasi-moderate, survive the gauntlet of the Tea Party-dominated primary process
and win the Republican nomination in 2016?
But
Heilemann said, first, that Christie was probably conservative enough to
credibly dish the red meat for the arch-conservative set, and second, that the
real issue for Christie was surviving three more years without blowing himself
up (and I’m paraphrasing).
Well…Heilemann
sure seems smart as we sit here today.
The political landscape in January was dominated by the meltdown of Christie’s
presidential prospects in the wake of Bridgegate. As the subpoenas fly, it is hard to imagine
Christie surviving, particularly since the cover-up has already been
blown. And thus goes the Great Big Hope
of the Republican Party, the one GOP candidate brash enough to run on his
record, a Washington
outsider with demonstrated support from the middle and even some Democrats and
their core constituencies (including Hispanics). But all that seems so far away now!
Bridgegate
not only reinforced the dark side of the Christie image – that he is a bully
and a low-brow pol – but it also exposed exactly how partisan he could be, with
his vengeance-is-mine mode of targeting Democrats who dare to defy him. So much for that across-the-aisle appeal.
Some
commentators are seeing this as an opening for Scott Walker, another blue-state
governor (from Wisconsin )
who took on the unions and developed a national identity. It’s possible, but I think the real winner here
was Jeb Bush. The Christie immolation
more or less cleared out what passes for the moderate wing of the GOP for Bush,
and also, frankly, will increase the longing for a “grown-up” at the top of the
ticket. Paul Ryan, Rand Paul, Marco
Rubio and Ted Cruz may all be telegenic and bright, but they also are all
40-something newbies prone to brashness, and that may play less well at this
point. (OK, Paul is 51.)
What do the
polls says? Look below…and it’s Mike
Huckabee on top! Yes, the minister-turned-2008-candidate-turned-FOX-disher is indeed contemplating a run, and don’t
underestimate him. He would play well in
Iowa – he won there is easily in 2008 with 35% of the vote, and nearly
leveraged that into a win in South Carolina as well, losing to McCain by only 3
points. He’s tested, he’s approachable
(unlike his fellow right-wingers) and he may go over nicely in this next slightly-kinder-and-gentler phase of
the Republican identity crisis.
|
2013
|
2013
|
2014
|
|
Jan-Oct
|
Nov/Dec
|
1/1 - 2/11
|
Huckabee
|
13
|
13
|
15
|
Christie
|
16
|
19
|
13
|
Ryan
|
14
|
11
|
12
|
Bush
|
12
|
10
|
12
|
Paul
|
13
|
14
|
11
|
Rubio
|
14
|
9
|
8
|
Cruz
|
10
|
12
|
8
|
|
3
|
5
|
5
|
Jindal
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
As for
Christie? He will be left to wonder what
I have been wondering for two years now….whether he should have jumped in the
race in 2012, perhaps right after Super Tuesday when party bigwigs and
voters alike were desperate for a new face.
I have long said that the lesson of Barack Obama was “strike when you're hot.” Four more years is rarely kind
to the current sensation, and Christie surely proves that. He may come back – McCain did in 2008 – but
somehow I think not. McCain had a
lifetime of accomplishment and war hero status to fall back on when times got
tough. Christie simply does not.
The other
major political news emerged in early February, with the twin items of the
death of immigration reform and the passing of a clean debt ceiling bill in the
House. The GOP continues to recalibrate,
with arch-conservatives still holding enough power to kill immigration, but not
enough to spark fiscal wars anew. John
Boehner’s read of the tea leaves is getting ever more difficult, and since he
“declared war” on the Tea Party in December, he continues to assess the speed
of the pendulum as it swings back to the center.
OBAMA APPROVAL RATING
President
Obama’s approval ratings continue to climb, as his “net negative” has improved
by 4 points over the last two months, from -12 to -8, based on 39 polls over
the last month. Nothing to write home
about – or more precisely, nothing to get him invited to some swing states or
districts for campaigning in the fall.
But he is showing no danger of slipping into the dreaded mid-low 30’s or
20’s, the land of Nixon , Bush 43 and Carter, and also Clinton and Reagan at their lowest. Obama may not have a Congress he can work
with, and therefore may be reduced to pursuing “small ball” initiatives much
like his two immediate predecessors – but it worked for them and will likely
work for him as well. As long as he
remains scandal-free (that is, in the “Watergate/Bridgegate” sense of the word,
not the “Benghazi ”
sense) and Obamacare ultimately succeeds, I believe history will treat him
kindly.
Obama
Approval Rating
|
Election Day 2012
|
8-Nov
|
8-Dec
|
10-Jan
|
11-Feb
|
Approve
|
49.6
|
45.5
|
39.9
|
42.6
|
43.8
|
Disapprove
|
47.4
|
52.5
|
51.8
|
52.6
|
51.4
|
Net
|
2.2
|
-6.9
|
-11.9
|
-10.0
|
-7.6
|
OBAMACARE RATINGS
We do not
have as yet the January Obamacare enrollment figures, but Katherine Sebelius
made a speech on January 22nd in which she said that there had
already been 800,000 more enrollees to that point in January, pushing the total
to 3 million. Suddenly the
Administration’s enrollment goal of 7 million by March 31st is
looking possible. And while “under 35
year old” enrollment was at only 24% by the end of December, it is rising. The goal of 40% may be unreachable but the
Administration is on the record with the view that anything in the 30’s is
workable economically.
And so, the
“net negative” of Obamacare is slowing dwindling as well, up 5 points in the
last two months, from -18 to -13.
Obamacare
|
Election Day 2012
|
8-Nov
|
8-Dec
|
10-Jan
|
11-Feb
|
For/Favor
|
40.0
|
41.6
|
38.4
|
38.2
|
39.0
|
Oppose/Against
|
50.8
|
49.3
|
56.6
|
53.4
|
52.1
|
Net
|
-10.8
|
-7.6
|
-18.2
|
-15.1
|
-13.1
|
ECONOMETER
The
Econometer is unchanged since last month at +50.6. The rise in consumer confidence was offset by
the decline of the Dow. The GDP growth
was surprisingly strong for the last quarter, undercutting claims that the 4.1%
growth in Q3 was driven mainly by inventory building and was thus aberrant. All Econometer measures remain stronger – far
stronger – than those of Election Day 2012, and thus the whopping +50.6 score
(for new readers, the “Econometer” is a single measure of how strong the economy is relative to the last Election Day; see the right hand column for a complete
explanation). A strengthening economy
may ultimately become a solid issue for the Democrats in the fall, but two
straight weakish job reports have kept the most robust adjectives to
describe the recovery on the sidelines. “Tepid” remains
the descriptor of choice.
|
Election Day 2012
|
8-Nov
|
8-Dec
|
10-Jan
|
11-Feb
|
Econometer
|
0.0
|
29.0
|
37.2
|
50.5
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unemployment Rate
|
7.9
|
7.3
|
7.0
|
6.7
|
6.6
|
Consumer Confidence
|
73.1
|
71.2
|
70.4
|
78.1
|
80.7
|
Price of Gas
|
3.71
|
3.40
|
3.34
|
3.37
|
3.38
|
Dow Jones
|
13,330
|
15,395
|
15,952
|
16,242
|
15,993
|
GDP
|
3.1
|
4.1
|
4.1
|
4.1
|
3.2
|
CONGRESSIONAL GENERIC BALLOT
The
Republicans continue to hold a very slim lead in the “generic” ballot, with
about 20% of the electorate expressing no opinion...yet.
Generic
Congressional Ballot
|
Election Day 2012
|
8-Nov
|
8-Dec
|
10-Jan
|
11-Feb
|
Democrat
|
46.3
|
45.2
|
40.7
|
41.4
|
39.9
|
Republican
|
46.0
|
39.5
|
41.9
|
41.9
|
40.7
|
Net
|
0.3
|
5.7
|
-1.1
|
-0.5
|
-0.8
|
DEMOCRATIC 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE
As for the
Democratic “race” for 2016, Hillary continues to dominate. Indeed, “dominate” is simply not a strong
enough word to describe the polls. She
is laying low and raising money, doubtless rehearsing her Benghazi defense until it is airtight. Not holding office is a beautiful thing!
|
2013
|
2013
|
2014
|
|
Jan-Oct
|
Nov/Dec
|
1/1 - 2/11
|
|
59
|
67
|
68
|
Biden
|
13
|
11
|
9
|
|
6
|
7
|
7
|
Cuomo
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
O'Malley
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Schweitzer
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
A/O or N/A
|
24
|
26
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment