Barack
Obama is apparently mad as hell and he’s not going to take it any more. No more “Mr. Lead From Behind.” No more negotiating under threat of
government shutdowns and default deadlines.
The Obama
Administration had been drifting along in a listless second term, tethered to
an economy characterized by steady but very slow improvement, stuck in a series
of relatively modest, acronym-laden controversies (NSA, IRS, AP, etc), unable
to deliver on a domestic agenda in the face of implacable opposition (see:
immigration, gun control), and at the mercy of a careening Middle East.
And then, a
foreign policy crisis and a series of domestic budget/deficit deadlines catalyzed
the administration into very hard-nosed positions that may well be defining for
the duration of the Obama presidency. In
both instances, Obama has been far from the passive take-what-I-can-get negotiator
that even his followers have come to despair.
It’s amazing what re-elections – and no more elections – will do for the
spine.
Of course I
am talking about Syria
and the current budget impasse. Starting
with Syria ,
I am reminded of the Branch Rickey gem, “Luck is the residue of design.” The “design” aspect may have had all the elegance
of sausage-making, but the outcome could turn out very well indeed. Obama staked out a lonely position after the
Assad regime’s chemical attack on its own people, threatening military action
that had little support either internationally or domestically. But clearly it was Obama’s threat and John
Kerry’s trial balloon calling for unilateral Syrian surrender of its chemical
weapons that have set us on a path of peaceful destruction of that very arsenal.
Obama is
being lambasted for “on the fly diplomacy,” but where would we be save for
these twin administration actions? So
the Russians bit on Kerry’s “off the cuff” call for a Syrian weapon surrender
and ran with it…this is bad? And while
there is a long way to go in the dismantling and verification processes, if
Assad chooses to use chemical weapons again while this process is underway, I
think it is clear that world reaction would be far more hostile and unified
than the first time.
As for the
government shutdown, I have another favorite quote, this one from Rahm Emanuel,
and I quote it in full: “You never let a serious crisis go to
waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you
could not do before.” President
Obama is taking a tough stand again – no negotiations whatsoever on any aspects
of Obamacare, or any other program, for that matter -- and his calculus on this
one is a good deal clearer. One part is
principle, that the Tea Party (or any subset of legislators) cannot be allowed
to hold the nation hostage (whether the result be a shutdown or a default on
the debt) simply to weaken laws they don’t like. And the other part is politics, his read that
the American people agree with him, and therefore the risk of a hard line stance
is worth it. Essentially, he wants to
use this crisis to break the Tea Party, and break it now, by denying them their
only weapon.
He could be
right. Survey after survey shows the
following:
·
The
Tea Party is weakening. Tea Party
support is down to its near-record low of 22% (the high was 32% and the low
21%). (Gallup )
·
Nearly
two-thirds (63%) of Americans fault the Republicans’ handling of the Budget
crisis, versus 56% faulting Democrats and 50% President Obama (ABC/Washington
Post)
·
Just
27% of Americans think it is a good idea to use a government shutdown as a
means of blocking or weakening Obamacare (ABC/Washington Post)
Many other
polls support these general numbers. The
only question is whether, as the shutdown proceeds, the gap between those who
fault the Republicans, Democrats or Obama narrows, thus putting pressure on
Obama. But the moderate House
Republicans appear to be the noisiest ones at this point, trying to see if they
have enough votes to create a counter-rebellion within their own party.
To that
point, I’m not sure the American people understand that the House would almost
certainly support the “clean” Senate bill for a continuing budget resolution
with “no strings attached” (that is, nothing related to Obamacare or any other
issue) if they were allowed to vote on it, as such a bill would be supported by
House Democrats and enough moderate Republicans to create a majority. But Speaker Boehner has been reluctant to
violate the so-called “Hastert Rule” that no legislation should be brought
forward without majority Republican support.
The Tea Party opposition prevents this, thus their outsized power.
Boehner has
indicated he will go just that route at the next impasse, the debt ceiling that
needs to be raised by October 17th.
But thus far, he continues to lead the charge on the government
shutdown. Perhaps he is simply delaying
his inevitable fold until the debt crisis comes to the fore…one wag said, “If
you know you are going to take a bullet, take only one.”
I’ve
thought long and hard whether to devote any space in this monthly update to
Senator Ted Cruz. The spectacle of his
21-hour non-filibuster (unlike a normal filibuster, this lengthy rant could not
serve the usual purpose of delaying a vote beyond a required deadline) was
noteworthy, in the main, for its utter disregard of a political “exit strategy.”
Its only real purpose was to identify Ted Cruz as the face of anti-Obamacare, a
nice identity to run on in Iowa . Cruz was excoriated by his fellow GOP
Senators for not having an answer to the question, “If we go along with you,
what next?” Most sensible Republicans know these shutdowns
and debt ceiling crusades only really hurt the GOP, and change nothing.
THE NUMBERS
History may
look back on this monthly kindly for President Obama, but current public support
continues to flag, albeit slowly. He is
now at a net -6.2 approval rating (based on 39 polls) for the month, an 8-point
swing from his Election Day 2012 +2.2.
The seeming dithering on Syria
and the early shutdown madness clearly hurt him this month, as well as another
month of glacial economic improvement.
Obama
Approval Rating
|
7-Nov
|
8-Jul
|
5-Aug
|
5-Sep
|
5-Oct
|
Approve
|
49.6
|
46.0
|
46.0
|
45.1
|
45.3
|
Disapprove
|
47.4
|
48.7
|
48.8
|
49.6
|
51.5
|
Net
|
2.2
|
-2.7
|
-2.7
|
-4.5
|
-6.2
|
The
Econometer gives evidence of that stasis.
Because of the shutdown, the Bureau of Labor Statistics did not have
employee on board to put together the monthly unemployment report. Other measures were relatively flat.
Econometer
|
7-Nov
|
8-Jul
|
5-Aug
|
5-Sep
|
5-Oct
|
Econometer
|
0.0
|
27.5
|
33.3
|
32.1
|
33.1
|
Unemployment Rate
|
7.9
|
7.6
|
7.4
|
7.3
|
7.3
|
Consumer Confidence
|
73.1
|
81.4
|
80.3
|
81.5
|
79.7
|
Price of Gas
|
3.71
|
3.64
|
3.72
|
3.65
|
3.59
|
Dow Jones
|
13,330
|
15,013
|
15,506
|
15,098
|
15,321
|
GDP
|
3.1
|
1.8
|
2.5
|
2.5
|
2.5
|
But the
biggest change of the month has been the swing of the so-called “generic”
congressional ballot in favor of the Democrats by a healthy 3.4 points. That perhaps is the clearest evidence yet of
who is losing the most in a town that at this point is devoid of winners.
Generic
Congressional Ballot
|
7-Nov
|
8-Jul
|
5-Aug
|
5-Sep
|
5-Oct
|
Democrat
|
46.3
|
39.3
|
40.5
|
38.4
|
41.9
|
Republican
|
46.0
|
41.3
|
39.5
|
38.8
|
38.4
|
Net
|
0.3
|
-2.0
|
1.0
|
-0.4
|
3.4
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment