The Yankees
have been taking a memorable walk on the poor side of town, getting a taste of how life feels operating with a payroll of roughly $100 million (the Yanks are
missing roughly half of their $200+ million in salary commitments). It has been magical, watching the club
scratch and claw its way into contention on the backs of untested rookies,
scrap heap veterans, and the few blue chip talents the club has that have gone
unscathed.
But that
sound you just heard was that of the glass slipper shattering. It’s been fun, but the Yanks are crashing
back to the .500 mark that their statistics say they deserve (if that).
Let’s break
down how the Yanks are doing versus my expectations, which were for a 90-win
season. And then let’s speculate on what
could happen the rest of the year, if, say, “The Cavalry” (Jeter, A. Rod,
Cervelli and Granderson) all return by August 1st.
Smoke
and Mirrors: Doing Better Than Their
Stats Would Indicate
Though the
Yanks are not much above .500, at 42 wins they are still outperforming their
statistics pretty handily. They have a
dreadful team OPS of .682 (13th in the league, barely ahead of
Chicago and Houston) but good pitching with a team ERA of 3.87, 5th in the
league. Using my regression equation, those
OPS and ERA figures should translate to only 37 wins thus far. Bill James’ Pythagorean Formula, based on
runs scored versus runs allowed, yields a similar result, 38 expected wins.
So with 42
wins they have five more wins than they should.
And that is because they continue to win close games at an unnatural
rate. I call this the “Smoke and
Mirrors” effect because there is no empirical reason why it is has happened,
should happen – or should continue. It is simply difficult for a team to outpace their statistics over the course of a full season.
|
Won
|
Lost
|
1 or 2
run margin games
|
26
|
16
|
3+ run
margin games
|
16
|
23
|
Eight
Wins Behind My Prediction: The Subs Are
Playing More and Doing Worse
My
preseason projection (http://www.borntorunthenumbers.com/2013/03/yankees-2013-prediction-is-it-1965-i_31.html)
indicated the Yanks would have 45 wins at this point, and they have 42….not far
off. But as I just said, they actually
should have only 37 given their Team OPS and ERA…so really they are off 8 my
projection. Why so far off?
This is not
so hard, of course. It’s the hitting. All 8 wins off are attributed to the hitting.
The
pitching has been as predicted; in fact, their 3.86 ERA is almost exactly where
I predicted (3.87). But I actually am
off on the components thus far: the
starters are doing worse than I expected (4.11 versus 3.84) but the relievers have
been far better (3.37 versus 3.92). The
relievers who made the opening day roster are performing very close to expectations: 3.43 versus 3.34. And the emergency call-ups, led by Preston
Claiborne and Vidal Nuno, have performed superbly, which is often not the outcomes (see: Brett Marshall).
So of
course it is the hitting, and it is a double whammy. Of course I knew going into the year the
Jeter, A. Rod, Granderson and Teixeira would miss months of the season…but
they’ve missed even more time than that, and Youkilis and Cervelli have joined
them on the extended DL. So the subs are
playing far more than expected….but the second part of the whammy is that those
subs are also doing much worse than I expected.
|
PLAN
|
PLAN
|
PLAN
|
|
ACTUAL
|
ACTUAL
|
ACTUAL
|
|
OPS
|
Plate apps.
|
P.A. %
|
|
OPS
|
Plate apps.
|
P.A. %
|
Starters
|
0.777
|
5050
|
81%
|
|
0.765
|
1485
|
50%
|
Subs
|
0.684
|
1175
|
19%
|
|
0.605
|
1502
|
50%
|
TOTAL
|
0.757
|
6250
|
100%
|
|
0.682
|
2998
|
100%
|
You can see
that the starters (who I defined as Cervelli ,
Tex , Cano, Jeter, A Rod &
Yuke, Gardner, Granderson, Ichiro and Hafner) have hit about as expected (.765
OPS versus plan of .777) but only have about 50% of the team’s total at bats versus
the 80% I expected. Further, the subs
have an OPS of only .605 versus my expectation of .684.
Let’s break
the subs down further. The Yanks started
the season with a bunch of experienced backups who were expected to hold the
fort until the Cavalry returned (Wells, Overbay, Stewart, Nix, Nunez, Francisco
and Boesch). And then they signed or
called up a bunch of other players when those missed games piled up. In general, both groups have underperformed
badly.
|
PLAN
|
PLAN
|
PLAN
|
|
ACTUAL
|
ACTUAL
|
ACTUAL
|
Among Subs:
|
OPS
|
Plate apps.
|
P.A. %
|
|
OPS
|
Plate apps.
|
P.A. %
|
Expected Subs
|
0.686
|
1025
|
16%
|
|
0.641
|
1165
|
39%
|
Call Ups
|
0.667
|
150
|
3%
|
|
0.478
|
337
|
11%
|
TOTAL
|
0.684
|
1175
|
19%
|
|
0.682
|
2998
|
50%
|
You can see
the veteran group that was on the roster on Opening Day have achieved an OPS of
only .641 versus the expectation of .686, while chewing up 39% of total plate
appearances versus a plan of 16%. Only
Overbay, Stewart and Boesch performed well; Nix, Nunez and Wells have been overstretched at best, abysmal (Ben Francisco) at worse.
But the
call-ups and retreads have been even...well, what can be worse than "abysmal?" They have been forced to make 11% of the team’s overall plate appearance
and have a disastrous OPS of .478. David
Adams, Austin Romine, Reid Brignac, Chris Nelson, Thomas Neal, Corban Joseph and Alberto Gonzalez have proven
they are simply not up for major league pitching; among this group, only Zoilo
Almonte has acquitted himself well.
So the stop
gaps, young and old, have simply been a disaster. They are sturdy gloves perhaps, good
clubhouse types, no doubt, but starting major leaguers – for the New York
Yankees at that – they are not.
SECOND
HALF OUTLOOK
How many
wins will the Yankees have by the end of the season? That depends on two questions: 1) will the Yanks continue to benefit from
Smoke and Mirrors?, and 2) can “The Cavalry” help them?
Here is my
conclusion:
- If Smoke and Mirrors vacate the
premises, the Yanks will end up with 77
wins.
- If Smoke and Mirrors continue,
that’s worth 5 more wins, up to 82.
- And if the Cavalry does indeed
ride in, that could give a pop of 5 wins, to 87.
Let me put
these scenarios in a chart and then explain each one.
|
Smoke &
|
|
Full
|
Full
|
First
|
Second
|
|
|
Mirrors
|
Cavalry
|
Year
|
Year
|
Half
|
Half
|
Total
|
|
Continue
|
Comes
|
OPS
|
ERA
|
Wins
|
Wins
|
Wins
|
1) Continue
OPS of May/June
|
No
|
No
|
0.665
|
3.87
|
42
|
35
|
77
|
2) Continue
OPS of May/June plus SM
|
Yes
|
No
|
0.665
|
3.87
|
42
|
40
|
82
|
3)
Continue OPS of May/June plus SM&C
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
0.709
|
3.87
|
42
|
45
|
87
|
In each
scenario I assume that the pitching continues along at the same level of
effectiveness (that 3.87 ERA). This
seems reasonable given that the Yanks pitching is on track with my projection,
and even as Andy Pettitte seems to be fading, everyone else seems pretty solid
and there is depth with Nova and Pineda knocking at the door of the rotation.
In Scenarios 1 and 2, I assume that the relative hitting spree the Yanks
experienced in April was an aberration, and the May/June OPS of .644 is thus a better predictor of their future performance than the full first half OPS of .681. So I used the
.644 OPS for the balance of the year, resulting in a full year OPS of .665.
So:
Scenario 1: No More Smoke and Mirrors:
The Yanks continue their solid first half pitching and their May/June
hitting, but their “Smoke and Mirrors” luck runs out and they win only the 35
games my model says they deserve, to end up with only 77 wins.
Scenario 2: Smoke and Mirrors Continues: Same as Scenario 1, except their
Smoke and Mirrors performance in close games continues, thus adding the same
five wins they received in second half that they did in the first, bringing
them to 82 wins.
Scenario 3:
Here Comes the Cavalry: Same as Scenario 2, but here the Yanks get some help from the first team. I made the
simplifying assumption that each of Jeter, A.Rod, Granderson and Cervelli make
it back by August 1st, giving them 55 games as starters. I assumed each would be reasonably productive
though not insanely so: Jeter at an OPS
of .700, A. Rod at .750, Granderson at .775 and Cervelli at .700. I’m assuming their plate appearances will
match what their replacements have been doing; yes, they might bat higher in
the lineup and get more at bats, but they will also rest more. When you do the math, this equates to the
Cavalry providing a collective .733 OPS, which is quite an upgrade versus the
.600 OPS their replacements have been offering.
Over 55
games, such an upgrade makes a difference.
Assuming Cano, Gardner ,
Overbay and Ichiro do about the same as they have, the team OPS for those last
55 games will rise to. 744, and lift team OPS for the full year to .708. That
improvement, when plugged into my model, results in five more wins over those
55 games.
So, despite
the dreadful five game losing streak that seemed to mark the end of the dream,
the Yanks, with 87 wins, have an outside chance for a wild card slot. But they need: 1) to keep winning an absurd
number of one- and two-run margin games (“Smoke and Mirrors”); 2) for the
Cavalry to return and achieve a collective .733 OPS; and 3) for the pitching to hold up and the
non-injured starters to continue their production.
It’s not
out of the question. But….do you believe
in magic?
(P.S. The nice thing is that all of this is
measurable, so we can come back in late September and see how we did, after
they play all 162.)
How does your model account for the other-worldly caliber of competition in the A.L. East? If the season ended today, I have to assume that it would be the first time that every single team in a division finished at .500 or above. Surely such a strangely skewed competitive set makes the 42 wins even more remarkable... and must have an impact on your prediction going forward, yes?
ReplyDeleteYou really make a terrific point, and, no, I have no "strength of schedule" variable factored into this analysis. I will figure out how the Yanks schedule stacks up in the second half versus the other wild-card contenders. One thing I do know...the Red Sox have not made a West Coast swing yet, and the A's are tough, the Angels are on the rise, and the Mariners have King Felix and Iwakuma. Not easy!
ReplyDeleteI finally looked into the strength of schedule for the contending teams in the AL. At this juncture eight teams are in the mix for the five playoff spots: Boston, NY, Baltimore, Tampa Bay, Detroit, Cleveland, Oakland and Texas. (Of course almost anyone could play their way into contention, especially Toronto and the LA Angels who have both been on the upswing.) Anonymous' central point is correct...the Yankees and the AL East teams in general have tougher schedules than the others, in large part because they play each other so often, as follows: Baltimore has the toughest, with their second half opponents having a mideason won-loss percentage of (.516), followed by the Yankees (.509), the Red Sox (.504), Tampa Bay (.497), Oakland (.495), Texas (.487), Detroit (.474) and Cleveland (.473). I also discovered the amazing anomaly that the Tigers have yet not played the lowly White Sox, which means they play them 19 times from here on in, more than one-quarter of their remaining 75 games! I still think the Tigers will crack 100 wins, and that schedule will surely help!
Delete