This is the
year we have been waiting for: the votes
that define the full judgment on the Steroids Era. Mark McGwire and Rafael Palmiero have already
felt the sting of the abrupt dismissal of their juiced-up HOF stats (at least for now). And now the poster children of the era, two
players who would otherwise lay a viable claim to the titles “Best Player Ever”
and “Best Pitcher Ever,” Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens, face the judgment,
along with Sammy Sosa.
Some will
argue that Bonds and Clemens were HOF-worthy well before the grossly
exaggerated versions of themselves put up eye-popping stats at an age when most
mere athletic mortals are following a natural downward spiral towards
retirement. And thus their ticket to Cooperstown was already stamped before the needle and the
damage was done. Sure, and Pete Rose may
never have gambled as a player. So
what? In my book, they are toast.
So, I give you,
to start, my ballot, and then
my prediction. The two lists are very different because in
my view, voters do not typically do a very good job. Results will be announced on January 9th
My ballot: the nine players who are
worthy of entry into the HOF :
Mike
Piazza
|
Jeff
Bagwell
|
Fred
McGriff
|
Mike
Piazza
|
Alan
Trammell
|
Edgar
Martinez
|
Lee Smith
|
Curt
Schilling
|
Tim Raines
|
Let’s be
clear: I do not believe anyone who was
proven to have taken steroids (via the Mitchell report or a known failed test)
or HGH should ever get in the HOF . We can’t take away their stats, or their
trophies, or suspend them. In fact,
about all we can do is deny them entry to the HOF .
So let’s do that.
Also, I
don’t believe in this “doesn’t deserve the first ballot” crap. You are either a Hall of Famer or not. What is the point of “building momentum” over
the years? It makes no sense.
And who will actually get in? Mike Piazza, Craig Biggio and Jack Morris.
Here’s my
stab at how the voting will go:
|
Proj.
|
Proj
|
|
%
|
Votes
|
|
2013
|
2013
|
Mike
Piazza*
|
86.0%
|
520
|
Craig
Biggio*
|
79.3%
|
480
|
Jack
Morris
|
76.0%
|
460
|
Jeff
Bagwell
|
57.9%
|
350
|
Lee Smith
|
49.6%
|
300
|
Tim Raines
|
49.6%
|
300
|
Roger
Clemens*
|
41.3%
|
250
|
Barry
Bonds*
|
41.3%
|
250
|
Edgar
Martinez
|
35.5%
|
215
|
Alan
Trammell
|
34.7%
|
210
|
Curt
Schilling
|
28.1%
|
170
|
Fred
McGriff
|
19.0%
|
115
|
Larry
Walker
|
18.2%
|
110
|
Don
Mattingly
|
15.7%
|
95
|
Dale
Murphy
|
15.7%
|
95
|
Mark
McGwire
|
14.9%
|
90
|
Sammy
Sosa*
|
11.6%
|
70
|
Rafael
Palmiero
|
9.9%
|
60
|
Bernie
Williams
|
6.6%
|
40
|
David
Wells*
|
6.6%
|
40
|
Julio
Franco*
|
3.0%
|
18
|
Kenny
Lofton*
|
2.0%
|
12
|
Shawn
Green*
|
0.5%
|
3
|
Steve
Finley*
|
0.3%
|
2
|
Sandy
Alomar*
|
0.3%
|
2
|
Ryan
Klesko*
|
0.2%
|
1
|
Jeff
Conine*
|
0.0%
|
0
|
Royce
Clayton*
|
0.0%
|
0
|
Reggie
Sanders*
|
0.0%
|
0
|
Aaron
Sele*
|
0.0%
|
0
|
Rondell
White*
|
0.0%
|
0
|
Jeff
Cirillo*
|
0.0%
|
0
|
Todd
Walker*
|
0.0%
|
0
|
Woody
Williams*
|
0.0%
|
0
|
* First time on the ballot
Note that I think Jack Morris will get elected,
even though I don’t think he is worthy.
More on that later.
One other
prediction: Barry Bonds and Roger
Clemens will get the exact same number of votes.
THE BALLOT: WHO IS “HALL WORTHY”?
Let’s start
with the starting pitchers. I’m going to
reference the chart below. I’ve compared
the six pitchers on the ballot (Clemens, Schilling, Wells, Morris, Sele and
Woody Williams) with three
groupings: all Hall of Fame starting
pitchers (the line labeled HOF), guys who are on the HOF that I consider “borderline”
(by virtue of having a Tom Gardner Score of around 50 based on my regression
equation) and other guys were are NOT in the HOF who were also borderline (by
the same method; I used Luis Tiant, Ron Guidry, Doc Gooden, David Cone and
Jimmy Key for this group).
You can
clearly see that Roger Clemens is
far superior to every grouping. He’s a
certain HOF’er absent the steroids, but so be it. He’s out.
|
W
|
L
|
PCT.
|
ERA+
|
WAR
|
TG Score
|
TG Vote
|
Clemens**
|
354
|
184
|
0.658
|
143
|
134
|
122/77
|
No
|
|
266
|
184
|
0.596
|
122
|
65
|
64
|
|
My
borderline
|
219
|
154
|
0.599
|
123
|
57
|
50
|
|
Schilling
|
216
|
146
|
0.597
|
128
|
76
|
51
|
Yes
|
Wells
|
239
|
157
|
0.604
|
108
|
49
|
49
|
No
|
Morris
|
254
|
168
|
0.602
|
105
|
39
|
45
|
No
|
Borderline
not in
|
195
|
124
|
0.612
|
117
|
51
|
42
|
|
Sele
|
148
|
112
|
0.569
|
100
|
18
|
5
|
No
|
Williams,
Woody
|
132
|
116
|
0.532
|
103
|
28
|
-8
|
No
|
* Tiant, Guidry, Gooden, Cone, Key
** Steroids tainted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The more
interesting cases are Curt Schilling,
David Wells and Jack Morris, who had very similar careers, and were also known for
postseason excellence. Each had 200+
wins (but not the high 200’s) and each won 60% of their decisions. Each are classic borderline types, compiling
stats that are similar to both the guys that squeaked in and those who just
missed. So why is Schilling deserving,
but not Wells and Morris?
1) Schilling, while having fewer wins, had an
ERA+ of 128, which means his ERA was 28% better than the average for the league
of his career. Wells’ and Morris’ ERA’s
were only 8% and 5% better, which is very low by HOF standards (note the borderline guys were
123 and 117.)
2) Schilling had a “WAR” (Wins Above Replacement
Value) of 76 while the other two have WAR’s below 50. This means that Schilling, over his career,
compiled 76 more wins than a “replacement” player – that is, a typical 5th
or 6th starter) – would have compiled.
3) Schilling’s postseason stats are far better
than the other two: he was 11-2 with a 2.23
ERA. Wells was 10-5 with a 3.17 and
Morris was 7-4 with a 3.80.
So, much as
it pains me, since I’m not a big Schilling fan and, god knows, I am a Yankee
fan, but Curt deserves the plaque.
I’m not
even going to dignify Aaron Sele and
Woody Williams with any
commentary.
CATCHERS
There are
two catchers on the ballot, Piazza and Sandy Alomar. Mike Piazza
has some steroid whispers but no proof.
He is easily the greatest hitting catcher of all-time. He dominates the other groups even more than
Clemens. Sandy Alomar is not even close to borderline, though obviously he
was the better defensive catcher. But let’s
not waste too much time here: Piazza is
a must.
Just to
clarify this chart, OPS+ is the hitting equivalent of ERA+: OPS is “on base percentage plus slugging
percentage,” and the “+” means the statistic is indexing the player’s OPS to
the league average for his era. Thus
Piazza, essentially, hit a whopping 42% better than the league average.
Catchers
|
OPS+
|
Hits
|
Avg.
|
HR
|
RBI
|
WAR
|
TG Score
|
TG Vote
|
Piazza
|
142
|
2,127
|
0.308
|
427
|
1,335
|
59
|
93
|
Yes
|
|
119
|
1,773
|
0.285
|
94
|
1,013
|
49
|
55
|
|
TG
borderline
|
127
|
1,558
|
0.301
|
113
|
890
|
45
|
51
|
|
Borderline
not in
|
113
|
1,851
|
0.273
|
23
|
980
|
43
|
51
|
|
Alomar
|
86
|
1,236
|
0.273
|
112
|
588
|
12
|
10
|
No
|
*Simmons,
Parrish, Munson, Freehan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIRST BASEMEN
Like
Piazza, Jeff Bagwell hears some
whispers about steroids…such is the fate of any muscle-bound star of the era,
even those never mentioned in the Mitchell Report or with any failed drug
tests. With an OPS+ of 149 and a WAR of
80, not to mention 449 homers and over 1500 RBI’s, he’s a certain HOF’er.
Rafael Palmiero and Mark McGwire are both HOF
material, but both are tainted and thus doomed to the outside, though they will
continue to get their votes.
Fred McGriff is a fascinating case and I tip the
scales in his favor. He’s borderline in
many ways, but with a 50+ score on both WAR and the TG score, his power stats
(493 homers and 1,550 RBIs) get him a plaque in my view. Very tough call.
Don Mattingly was the best player in the game for
a 6-year period, but his back woes left him short. It is amazing to me how many great Yankees
fall just short of making the grade….this ballot alone includes Mattingly,
Wells and Bernie Williams, joining a long list of “borderline” Yankees who
never made it that includes Munson, Nettles, Guidry, Randolph, Cone, Maris,
Tino Martinez and others.
Alas, Ryan Klesko does not really belong on
the ballot.
First
Basemen
|
OPS+
|
Hits
|
Avg.
|
HR
|
RBI
|
WAR
|
TG Score
|
TG Vote
|
Bagwell
|
149
|
2,314
|
0.297
|
449
|
1,529
|
80
|
63
|
Yes
|
|
142
|
2,399
|
0.308
|
284
|
1,421
|
66
|
59
|
|
Palmiero**
|
132
|
3,020
|
0.288
|
569
|
1,835
|
66
|
73/10
|
No
|
McGriff
|
134
|
2,490
|
0.284
|
493
|
1,550
|
51
|
0.56
|
Yes
|
McGwire**
|
163
|
1,626
|
0.263
|
583
|
1,414
|
63
|
51/32
|
No
|
TG
borderline
|
138
|
2,198
|
0.297
|
363
|
1,391
|
54
|
49
|
|
Borderline
not in
|
131
|
2,248
|
0.297
|
250
|
1,180
|
53
|
44
|
|
Mattingly
|
128
|
2,153
|
0.307
|
222
|
1,099
|
40
|
38
|
No
|
Klesko
|
128
|
1,564
|
0.279
|
278
|
987
|
27
|
17
|
No
|
* D. Allen, W. Clark, Grace, Garvey, Olerud,
Hernandez
** Steriods
tainted
SECOND BASEMEN
Craig Biggio is a classic HOF candidate and should be elected. Conventional thinkers will point to his 3,000
hits as the golden ticket, but his 66 WAR and .73 TG Score are certainly HOF caliber. He has excellent power stats for a second
baseman, but his OPS+ is borderline at 111.
Second
Basemen
|
OPS+
|
Hits
|
Avg.
|
HR
|
RBI
|
WAR
|
TG Score
|
TG Vote
|
Biggio
|
111
|
3,060
|
0.281
|
291
|
1,175
|
66
|
72
|
Yes
|
|
120
|
2,405
|
0.299
|
152
|
1,084
|
69
|
54
|
|
TG
borderline
|
113
|
2,584
|
0.301
|
161
|
1,070
|
64
|
54
|
|
Borderline
not in
|
116
|
2,137
|
0.273
|
174
|
878
|
46
|
40
|
|
Walker,
Todd
|
98
|
1,316
|
0.289
|
107
|
545
|
8
|
-8
|
No
|
* Whitaker,
Grich, Randolph
SHORTSTOPS
I have long
thought of Alan Trammell as a Hall
of Fame shortstop, but he’s suffered for being a peer of Cal Ripken, Jr. and a
forerunner of the Jeter/A. Rod/Nomar/Tejada era of tremendous hitting
shortstops. But his stats clearly match
those of HOF shortstops
on all dimensions, and he should be inducted.
His long-time double play partner, Lou Whitaker, is no longer on the
ballot, a true injustice as his stats largely mirror Trammell’s and are even more impressive compared to second
basemen.
Royce Clayton is far from HOF material.
Shortstops
|
OPS+
|
Hits
|
Avg.
|
HR
|
RBI
|
WAR
|
TG Score
|
TG Vote
|
Trammell
|
110
|
2,365
|
0.285
|
185
|
1,003
|
67
|
58
|
Yes
|
|
109
|
2,335
|
0.286
|
117
|
1,056
|
63
|
54
|
|
TG
borderline
|
105
|
2,248
|
0.284
|
59
|
939
|
54
|
49
|
|
Borderline
not in
|
103
|
2,143
|
0.283
|
129
|
887
|
39
|
42
|
|
Clayton
|
77
|
1,904
|
0.258
|
110
|
723
|
16
|
10
|
No
|
* Bartell,
Stephens, Fernandez, Dark, Concepcion
THIRD BASEMEN
Jeff Cirillo is the only third base candidate
this year, and he is far from qualified for the HOF .
Third
Basemen
|
OPS+
|
Hits
|
Avg.
|
HR
|
RBI
|
WAR
|
TG Score
|
TG Vote
|
|
124
|
2,352
|
0.296
|
228
|
1,203
|
67
|
41
|
|
TG
borderline
|
121
|
2,313
|
0.284
|
235
|
1,225
|
66
|
37
|
|
Borderline
not in
|
115
|
2,223
|
0.273
|
290
|
1,155
|
55
|
28
|
|
Cirillo
|
102
|
1,598
|
0.296
|
112
|
727
|
33
|
-6
|
No
|
* B. Bell,
D. Evans, Madlock, Nettles, Boyer
OUTFIELDERS
A large
group of outfielders/DH’s are on the ballot and only one is worthy is my view,
and that is Edgar Martinez.
Let’s
dispense with Barry Bonds
first. What can I say, he has
unbelievable, dare I say Ruthian stats.
But no go.
Edgar Martinez is another fascinating call, a guy
who spent roughly ___% of his career as a DH, one of the few primarily DH candidates
we have had (Paul Molitor was another).
Edgar gets my vote on the strength of that singular hitting talent, with
an exceptional OPS of 147, and WAR and TG Scores well above 50.
Tim Raines was another tough call. With a WAR of 65 he certainly merits consideration,
even though his OPS+ is only 123. Raines
of course had 808 steals, and even more impressive was his 85% stolen base success
rate, one of the best ever, which clearly was a huge plus not captured in the
OPS (you need, I believe, a 70% rate for the increased scoring opportunities created
by a successful steal to offset the removal of same and the lost out of an out
stealing). So the Rock gets in.
Larry Walker looks like a strong candidate but
the “Coors Field” Factor is quite strong for him. His Coors OPS was an otherwordly 1.068, but
only .865 on the road, which in a given year may not even land him on an
All-Star team.
Sammy Sosa is interesting because I’m not sure
he is a HOF’er even if he was not tainted.
His OPS+ of 128 is borderline, but he would probably get the nod for his
power stats and a decent WAR. But no.
Bernie Williams is another one that is a tough
call. His regular season stats are
borderline at best, with below 50 WAR and TG Score. But he is the all-time leader in postseason
RBIs and second in hits, runs, home runs, doubles and total bases. Having said that, his postseason stats are
quite similar to those of his regular seasons…and thus the whole picture does
not add up to Hall-worthiness.
Steve Finley and Kenny Lofton are fine players with combinations of speed and power
reminiscent of Tim Raines, but both are Rock-lite, not Rock-like.
Dale Murphy is getting a fair amount of
discussion as this is his last year of eligibility, but the two-time MVP has
stats that are across the board below the borderline outfielders (guys like
Rusty Staub, Al Oliver, Dave Parker, Dwight Evans and Reggie Smith, none of
whom made the HOF).
And the other
outfielders, Shawn Green, Jeff Conine,
Reggie Sanders and Rondell White,
are all pretty good players, each with an All-Star pick or two, but each falls
well short of Cooperstown consideration.
Outfielders/DH
|
OPS+
|
Hits
|
Avg.
|
HR
|
RBI
|
WAR
|
TG Score
|
TG Vote
|
Bonds**
|
182
|
2,935
|
0.298
|
762
|
1,996
|
158
|
1.16/.33
|
No
|
|
137
|
2,566
|
0.314
|
240
|
1,288
|
70
|
0.61
|
|
Martinez,
Edgar
|
147
|
2,247
|
0.312
|
309
|
1,261
|
64
|
0.59
|
Yes
|
Raines
|
123
|
2,605
|
0.294
|
170
|
980
|
65
|
0.50
|
Yes
|
TG borderline
|
130
|
2,448
|
0.309
|
198
|
1,165
|
51
|
0.50
|
|
Borderline
not in
|
126
|
2,527
|
0.286
|
310
|
1,352
|
49
|
0.50
|
|
Walker,
Larry
|
140
|
2,160
|
0.313
|
383
|
1,311
|
67
|
0.49
|
No
|
Sosa**
|
128
|
2,408
|
0.273
|
609
|
1,667
|
55
|
.47/-.36
|
No
|
Williams,
Bernie
|
125
|
2,336
|
0.297
|
287
|
1,257
|
47
|
0.42
|
No
|
Finley
|
104
|
2,548
|
0.271
|
304
|
1,167
|
40
|
0.30
|
No
|
Lofton
|
107
|
2,428
|
0.299
|
130
|
781
|
65
|
0.28
|
No
|
Murphy
|
119
|
2,111
|
0.265
|
398
|
1,266
|
44
|
0.28
|
No
|
Green,
Shawn
|
120
|
2,003
|
0.283
|
328
|
1,070
|
31
|
0.25
|
No
|
Conine
|
107
|
1,982
|
0.285
|
214
|
1,071
|
15
|
0.12
|
No
|
Sanders
|
115
|
1,666
|
0.267
|
305
|
983
|
37
|
0.08
|
No
|
White,
Rondell
|
108
|
1,519
|
0.284
|
198
|
768
|
26
|
(0.04)
|
No
|
* Staub,
Oliver, Parker, Evans, R. Smith
** Steroids tainted
HYBRID
Julio Franco is an interesting candidate, with
nearly 2600 hits. He split his time
roughly in thirds between second, short and OF/DH and I have therefore
concocted a hybrid set of comparables.
He’s basically a very strong hitting middle infielder but a relatively
modest DH-type. He’s not a Hall of Famer
– look at that WAR – but he lines up closer to the border than I would have
thought.
Hybrid
(1/3 SS/ 1/3 2B, 1/3 OF/DH)
|
OPS+
|
Hits
|
Avg.
|
HR
|
RBI
|
WAR
|
TG Score
|
TG Vote
|
|
122
|
2435
|
0.300
|
170
|
1142
|
67
|
56
|
|
TG
borderline
|
116
|
2427
|
0.298
|
139
|
1058
|
56
|
51
|
|
Borderline
not in
|
115
|
2269
|
0.281
|
204
|
1039
|
45
|
44
|
|
Franco
|
111
|
2,586
|
0.298
|
173
|
1,194
|
40
|
54
|
No
|
RELIEF PITCHERS
Relief
pitchers have not been around long enough for established norms to have been
established, much less regression equations built (although I’m working on
one!). But I simply find it hard to
argue against Lee Smith, who is
third on the all-time list of saves with 478, trailing only Mariano and Trevor
Hoffman. He is well ahead of #4, John
Franco (424), and light years ahead of Hall of Famers Ekersley (390), Fingers
(341), Gossage (310) and Sutter (300). I
can’t figure out why he has not done better in the voting to date.
Comments
welcome! And check back on January 9th
to see how I did!
As usual, thoughtful and convincing analyses. Reading through here, one name caught my eye and reminded me of a sore spot of mine. Is there any Hall of Fame "exception" that would let in a guy who was great, gutty, gritty and just had amazing leadership talent, but died before his career was really over? True, I am a Yankee fan; and no, I don't know how his stats compare to other HOF catchers; but I find it hard to believe that the Captain (Thurman Munson) was not a HOF-caliber player. Just wonderin . . .
ReplyDeleteThurmon is very close to being Hall-worthy. He has a WAR of 43 and TG Score of 45, close enough to the magic "50" mark, and terrific postseason stats, for sure. On that basis, he probably should have been voted in. The knock on Thurmon, I think, is not simply that his career was cut short (at age 32) by his tragic death, thus limiting his statistical output. It's more that at the time of his death, he was on a downward path. His power was gone, and thus his OPS was only average (literally on the league average) in '78 and '79. This would have been OK for a catcher, but his knees were shot and he would have had to become a DH or outfielder, and his production would have been poor for those positions. So I suspect he would have retired by 35 anyway, if not even sooner. His career stats, which are remarkably similar to non-HOF catcher Bill Freehan, may not have been augmented much further. But hey, very close call, and his stature, postseason results, championships and MVP push him over the top in my book.
DeleteInteresting and thoughtful article, but I have a couple of comments/questions.
ReplyDeleteFirst, I don't think you explained what a TG score is. I get that it's your initials, but I don't think you said what it represents or how it's calculated, therefore it was of little use to me. You've probably explained it in earlier posts, but this is the first of yours that I've read. I would recommend giving a quick breakdown of it anytime you use it.
Second, here is my problem with omitting all confirmed steroid users: It's perfectly reasonable and maybe even likely that players who used steroids but were never caught will still get elected. This would seem to reward them for being sneaky, or simply lucky. What if Bagwell, or Schilling, or Piazza actually DID use at some point, but simply never showed up on the Mitchell report and were never caught by any other means? I don't think we'll ever be able to say with any kind of certainty that there are no steroid users in the Hall, and therefore I don't think we should exclude an otherwise worth player simply because they used. Certainly we can and should look at their career and assess it with steroids in mind.
Hank Aaron is still the home run king in my mind, and so is Roger Maris for a single season, but I would also still vote for Barry Bonds (as well as Roger Clemens). Their plaques should perhaps mention their use of steroids, although I don't think there's any danger of history forgetting about it. But they'd get my vote simply because they were so incredibly good, both with and without PEDs. The Palmeiros and Sosas and McGwires would not get my vote because like I said we have to examine their careers through the lens of steroids, and while they had great careers they weren't really among the greatest of all-time, and without steroids they may have just been good, not great. Clemens and Bonds were great either way.
The problem I see with excluding players like Clemens and Bonds is that the Hall will likely be tainted by steroids either way, because clearly not every cheater was caught, and we really have no way of knowing who or how many were not caught. So we'd be pretending that the Hall is pristine regarding steroids, but in reality we'd never know, and could in fact be totally mistaken. I say we let the exposed cheaters in, although certainly penalizing them for cheating giving them much more demanding requirements for entry, and perhaps by also putting an effective asterisk on their plaques.
Again thanks for the interesting read.